Covid Jab or no Covid Jab? Discuss!

[funandflirty]

Maybe that`s why the Vaccine ( which isn`t a vaccine ?) has been given to older persons first ?.

Exactly why Hells .

 

[Percy666]

So you don`t have any children ?

This isnt the first time you have taken an obsessional interest in whether someone has children- it's of no concern to you who has children here or who doesnt. I dont discuss family members on a forum and despite telling you repeatedly I have no wish to disclose you keep asking anyway.. why is that and what relevance is it to a covid debate who has children ?

 

[DanNorfolk]

Lifesite news still exists, your response to a peer reviewed paper is to talk about a " youtube channel" lol. It is irrelevant whether lifesitenews is banned or not, the peer reviewed paper has nothing to do with them, they merely reported it.

Unfortunately people like you want to ban everything and everyone that disagrees with you, you throw your juvenile karen names out with anti vax and conspiracy as you foam at the mouth unable to discuss anything so report everything and beg for it to be removed like a baby with its hands over its eyes wailing at something it doesnt like

Meanwhile, in the real world, Karen, the "peer review" you refer to disagree with the findings of what is described as an extremely limited trial and the study itself goes into those limitations in more detail. Said 'peers' found in the comment section which you didn't read or know existed because you didn't read the study. You just read the paragraph that you assumed agreed with your stance.

Btw Karen, when Covid passports are introduced, which they will be, good luck with your "rebel without a mask" rebellion.

 

[hell2bwith76]

Can you imagine alien ,microscopic sized creatures saying " ahhh they have top scientists who say that peoples own biology will protect them against our advancing attack systems ? hahahah they are all fools !" nahhh you can`t imagine the reality Percy can you ? and i note that you have 1 follower who can understand it and agree . Just another pair of fools

 

[hell2bwith76]

Exactly why Hells .

Sorry if i ask such stupid questions F&F

 

[Bad_Influence]

Can you imagine alien ,microscopic sized creatures saying " ahhh they have top scientists who say that peoples own biology will protect them against our advancing attack systems ? hahahah they are all fools !" nahhh you can`t imagine the reality Percy can you ? and i note that you have 1 follower who can understand it and agree . Just another pair of fools

What?

 

[Percy666]

Can you imagine alien ,microscopic sized creatures saying " ahhh they have top scientists who say that peoples own biology will protect them against our advancing attack systems ? hahahah they are all fools !" nahhh you can`t imagine the reality Percy can you ? and i note that you have 1 follower who can understand it and agree . Just another pair of fools

Well bearing in mind most people who get covid dont know they have it clearly their own biology does protect them so what's your point other than making yourself look incredibly stupid again?

 

[hell2bwith76]

This isnt the first time you have taken an obsessional interest in whether someone has children- it's of no concern to you who has children here or who doesnt. I dont discuss family members on a forum and despite telling you repeatedly I have no wish to disclose you keep asking anyway.. why is that and what relevance is it to a covid debate who has children ?

Because anyone who hasn`t had children know fk all about children ! that`s why Percy .

 

[Brass]

The PCR test that was used to detect coronavirus was set at a 40-cycle threshold of amplification/replication as per the FDA's recommendation. However, even infectious disease "expert" tony himself is on record stating that an amplification/replication cycle above 35 is going to spit out almost all false-positives; others say anything above 30 cycles is meaningless. There was even a New York Tmes article stating that the PCR test has spit out 90% false-positives. It takes almost zero critical thinking skills to draw the obvious conclusion. Ninety percent false positives means no pandemic.

So, why did the FDA recommend a cycle-threshold of 40? That's a rhetorical question; they obviously wanted to create the illusion of a pandemic. Also, why didn't Tony bother to speak up concerning what can only be described as a deliberate and gross misapplication of a test? We'll never know because, thanks to a complicit media, Mr. Fauci is not required to publicly answer even one challenge to his dire predictions which are based on 90% false positive returns from a PCR test that was knowingly set too high.

Unfortunately, unless some talking head comes on tv and tells people it's okay to apply their own critical thinking skills to those factual numbers, they won't do it. They think they need permission to make the obvious inference and then respond to the falsehood they've been fed. And the real kicker is that the only ones they'll accept permission from are the same ones who neglected to inform them of the reason for all the false positives in the first place.

 

[hell2bwith76]

Well bearing in mind most people who get covid dont know they have it clearly their own biology does protect them so what's your point other than making yourself look incredibly stupid again?

Yet another statistic dug out of thin air eh ? get the facts .

 

[Percy666]

Because anyone who hasn`t had children know fk all about children ! that`s why Percy .

What a stupid comment, so women that cant have children know nothing about them for eg in your eyes ? What's your excuse knowing nothing about anything then as your entire world knowledge could fit onto a second class postage stamp?

 

[Percy666]

Yet another statistic dug out of thin air eh ? get the facts .

Are you saying that most people who get covid dont know they have it isn't true? Jesus you are one brainwashed old simpleton lol, turn the news off and actually research covid ffs

 

[hell2bwith76]

The PCR test that was used to detect coronavirus was set at a 40-cycle threshold of amplification/replication as per the FDA's recommendation. However, even infectious disease "expert" tony himself is on record stating that an amplification/replication cycle above 35 is going to spit out almost all false-positives; others say anything above 30 cycles is meaningless. There was even a New York Tmes article stating that the PCR test has spit out 90% false-positives. It takes almost zero critical thinking skills to draw the obvious conclusion. Ninety percent false positives means no pandemic.

So, why did the FDA recommend a cycle-threshold of 40? That's a rhetorical question; they obviously wanted to create the illusion of a pandemic. Also, why didn't Tony bother to speak up concerning what can only be described as a deliberate and gross misapplication of a test? We'll never know because, thanks to a complicit media, Mr. Fauci is not required to publicly answer even one challenge to his dire predictions which are based on 90% false positive returns from a PCR test that was knowingly set too high.

Unfortunately, unless some talking head comes on tv and tells people it's okay to apply their own critical thinking skills to those factual numbers, they won't do it. They think they need permission to make the obvious inference and then respond to the falsehood they've been fed. And the real kicker is that the only ones they'll accept permission from are the same ones who neglected to inform them of the reason for all the false positives in the first place.

I understand all of that perfectly !

 

[Bad_Influence]

So to summarise:

Masks do nothing.
Percy quotes facts from sites that the media don’t respect.
Twowhales is capable of copy/paste but has no opinions that he will stand for.
Hells has opinions but can’t back them up.

Just a normal forum then......

 

[hell2bwith76]

Are you saying that most people who get covid dont know they have it isn't true? Jesus you are one brainwashed old simpleton lol, turn the news off and actually research covid ffs

I leave that to REAL scientists not UKchatters scientists who have nothing else to do but read books by by the Conspirator Society and look for little chinks of argument to throw at real sciientists .

 

[funandflirty]

Ok ,at what age and is it true then that a young childs immune system is more than an adults ?

Again there are so many studies and so much research taking place around this very subject.

It is really interesting as so many factors impact child health and mortality.

 

[Percy666]

So to summarise:

Masks do nothing.
Percy quotes facts from sites that the media don’t respect.
Twowhales is capable of copy/paste but has no opinions that he will stand for.
Hells has opinions but can’t back them up.

Just a normal forum then......

No I quote facts from a peer reviewed study that was reported by a site " that the media doesnt apparently respect according to twochickens. The study itself had nothing to do with this site and there are many of these studies not just that one

 

[Percy666]

I leave that to REAL scientists not UKchatters scientists who have nothing else to do but read books by by the Conspirator Society and look for little chinks of argument to throw at real sciientists .

Who are these " real scientists" the ones who all disagree with each other and earlier in 2020 told us masks are of NO benefit to us? It doesnt matter , the fact stands that no one should be forced to wear them under 18

 

[Percy666]

hell would prob put a new born baby in a mask if he thought it'd slow down the spread of the dreaded covid.. @hell2bwith76 a serious question, if 1000 people of all age groups got covid how many do you think would die from it without medical intervention using a typical average number

 

[Percy666]

I shall look forward to your accurate reply tomorrow