Separate names with a comma.
Discussion in 'Debates' started by GdGdGy, Dec 29, 2018.
did ya hear about the dyslexic who beleves in dog?
I was a Christian in my youth, but lost my faith when I realised it lacked any credibility.
Believe in god but follow no organised religion
Spiritual but not religious
Cultural Christian but dislike Christianity
Europeans need a new religion as the old is dying and was replaced with liberalism, egalitarianism and zionism, Christianity has become weak emasculated and pathetic for those reasons. The churches will preach globalism and virtue signal progressive mantra for the detriment of traditional religious values and practices all too secure that state or big business funding which keeps the emptying churches in the black all whilst the pope gets excited with the unveiling of the newly erected Baphomet statue at the Vatican.
The priests, vicars and bishops all bow down to Christianities mother religion. Corruption is rife and subversion is real
Shame Christianity is the only religion which is politically correct for deconstruction and criticism but do the same for 'Islam' or the ''mother'' Abrahamic religion of the two 'Judaism' and you will probably end up getting your door kicked in by Mi5 lol
Voltaire "To learn who rules over you, simply find out who you are not allowed to criticize."
Causality is as sure and solid as 2+2 equaling 4. It's a basic rule of science. If you reject that you are the irrational one.
No assumption at all..!
There isn't much I don't know about DNA. Similarly RNA.
FACT. ...RNA was a very close relative of DNA. It was the FIRST genetic molecule to arise around 4 billion years ago, but in a primitive form, that later evolved into the DNA molecules that we see in life today.
When I said that RNA was a precursor to DNA, I did not at the same time state that RNA was responsible for the First Living Cell.
RNA doesn't work like that.
Have a read of this.
RNA - Wikipedia - Free Chat Rooms
Causality. IS a basic rule of Science. OK.!
Since you appear to be on the same page and we are now talking Science, remember that science does not allow for the 'Supernatural'.
Having a creator is not the super natural. It's a rational conclusion of causality.
No it isn't.
There can never be a conclusion to causality.
Who IS your Creator?...And why is he/she/it a better bet than someone else of a different faith to you who believes the same about 'Their' Creator.?
In terms of our existence there is a conclusion. We were created.
Every tribe ever studied have believed in a creator. There is no difference apart from language. We all have the same creator.
Anyone who believes in god shouldn't be bestowed any kind of responsibility in life, because they are clearly fcking brain damaged.
What a pleasant person you are, NOT!
Don’t worry about HeroesAreVillains, he’s a full hamper short of a picnic and doesn’t know how to play nice with others.