P
Percy666
Guest
"knock knock" who's there, dr, ... dr who ....from the WHO health board telling you to mask up
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
LmfaoKnock knock?
Lmfao
I didn't type lmao Percy?You two should go on a date, typing lmao to someone saying knock knock on a forum is screaming for attention.. go on
All of the news i have seen about wearing masks ,for months now ,has explained in detail that they are not meant to protect the wearer ! They are designed to protect other people who the wearer may pass the Virus on to. Thus i`ve no idea where all these studies have come from as they are really pointless.I just posted this:
The PCR test that was used to detect coronavirus was set at a 40-cycle threshold of amplification/replication as per the FDA's recommendation. However, even infectious disease "expert" tony himself is on record stating that an amplification/replication cycle above 35 is going to spit out almost all false-positives; others say anything above 30 cycles is meaningless. There was even a New York Tmes article stating that the PCR test has spit out 90% false-positives. It takes almost zero critical thinking skills to draw the obvious conclusion. Ninety percent false positives means no pandemic.
So, why did the FDA recommend a cycle-threshold of 40? That's a rhetorical question; they obviously wanted to create the illusion of a pandemic. Also, why didn't Tony bother to speak up concerning what can only be described as a deliberate and gross misapplication of a test? We'll never know because, thanks to a complicit media, Mr. Fauci is not required to publicly answer even one challenge to his dire predictions which are based on 90% false positive returns from a PCR test that was knowingly set too high.
Unfortunately, unless some talking head comes on tv and tells people it's okay to apply their own critical thinking skills to those factual numbers, they won't do it. They think they need permission to make the obvious inference and then respond to the falsehood they've been fed. And the real kicker is that the only ones they'll accept permission from are the same ones who neglected to inform them of the reason for all the false positives in the first place.
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
You want to excuse yourself from that debate and move on to masks and "vaccines." But first you need to explain how a faulty test that kicked out 90% false positives due to the cycle threshold being set way too high is justification for anything.
And how many pregnant women in that study you linked to?
Thank you ,i have my 2nd jab SundayWhale.... I hope all of us stay healthy, and get through this pandemic with no harm to our families, friends or each other.
x's 2.