HannahGabbana
UKChat Familiar
- Joined
- Dec 27, 2019
- Messages
- 68
- Reaction score
- 39
But I think I'm funnier hehe
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Careful... you'll be accused of being mentally challenged by some on here if you agree with me.But I think I'm funnier hehe
Ya must be mad. lolThat's why I like poco loco .
David Icke. The world is run by reptiles and the royal family are lizards.
In the video, Icke claims that a “cult” enforcing “global centralisation of power” created the Covid-19 pandemic to “dismantle” the world economic system, which will result in “mass global dependency on the state”.
Icke further claims that “they manipulate numbers of contaminations” in order to prolong restrictions until “they get what they want”.
Conspiracy theorist David Icke has released a long video that has been shared on social media, talking about the use of a drug called midazolam during the Covid-19 pandemic. He claims that midazolam was used to facilitate the “culling of old people”, and that Covid-19 is a faked pandemic used as a guise to allow this.
He also claims that tests for Covid-19 are “fake” and death certificates issued during the pandemic are fraudulent.
Banned from Twitter. Farcebook. YouTube.
Evidence??? All you do is fall back on you usual “that guy is a nutter” rhetoric when faced with evidence, as I have shown.I support both Snowden and Assange. You might or might not be aware Sir Keir Starmer the labour leader threw Julian Assange under a bus when he was head of the CPS. I will never vote labour while Sir Keir is in charge. I have no issues with whistleblowers at all.
You were claiming a few days ago there is data supporting your stance on Covid. Until you or any other Covid denier produce evidence I'll take your support of the stark raving mad lizard man David Icke with the pinch of salt it deserves.
Produce the evidence, any evidence at all, like both Snowden and Assange did and all broad-minded people will start to listen. It isn't rocket science.
Where has anyone quoted David Icke as evidence? You’re making it up as you go, yet again.David Icke is a sociopath, a dangerous, full-blown lunatic who should be sectioned under the Mental Health Act and sent to Broadmoor for the rest of his natural life.
Thinks that reptiles run the planet and that the Royal family are lizards.
No wonder Covid deniers quote him as "evidence".
I support both Snowden and Assange. You might or might not be aware Sir Keir Starmer the labour leader threw Julian Assange under a bus when he was head of the CPS. I will never vote labour while Sir Keir is in charge. I have no issues with whistleblowers at all.
You were claiming a few days ago there is data supporting your stance on Covid. Until you or any other Covid denier produce evidence I'll take your support of the stark raving mad lizard man David Icke with the pinch of salt it deserves.
Produce the evidence, any evidence at all, like both Snowden and Assange did and all broad-minded people will start to listen. It isn't rocket science.
Well said.I think perhaps you just made my point for me, labelling me as a denier
When have I ever denied the existence of Covid, not once.
I actually had it, my brother was in hospital with it.
My stance is not on Covid, it's on rushed vaccines that will not come out of phase 3 testing until late 2023 early 2024, how can we possibly know the consequences of mass vaccination without that data.
Also I made my view on Icke clear "rightfully portrayed as a nut job"
I think perhaps you just made my point for me, labelling me as a denier
Can you supply any scientific evidence to refute anything I’ve claimed or are you always going to just stamp your feet and call people ‘nutters’?..
You have previously made some pretty bold Covid claims. All unproven. You have had ample opportunity to provide evidence. You also totally ignored my response and have still not provided ANY data to support your thesis. You must know what "data" is in relation to scientific evidence because you brought data into the conversation in exactly the same context.
Provide some data, as evidence, to prove your various claims.
It isn't rocket science.
Deliberately allowing injections to take place which they know will harm or possibly kill people.
Yet not allowing that data to be shown by the media, or the media omitting to report it.