Right-wing driven myth that the BBC is "left" wing.

[SamBally]

You do know the average IQ is 100.
Not 85.

You clearly don't even understand the IQ test you quote. Average IQ ranges between 85 and 115 (15% deviation). Depending on the specific test and also depending on the purpose of the specific test.


The IQ test you quote means sweet F A in the real world outside the military.


Schoolboy error and not for the first time.

 

[Moriarty]

Oh, and just in case my fantastic communication is not translating.

What this nugget is claiming is, simply, that an Amazon driver with an IQ 2 points above the average IQ is an asset to society and that an Amazon driver with an IQ 2 points lower is a "burden".

That is even without questioning the initial IQ test. A-Z that's how social science works.

BTW "burden" is the charlatan's choice of word and not mine.



According to the charlatan and his far-right rhetoric, the disabled and the most vulnerable people in our society are a "burden" on that society. People who have worked their entire lives are also a "burden" on society" because the 10% he bleats on about includes all kinds of people from all walks of life.


Based solely on an IQ test that decides what is IQ and what isn't.

Yet again you use "Average" wrongly.
To re-iterate average is 100, the study I quoted was 85.

Come on man, do better.

"Based solely on an IQ test that decides what is IQ and what isn't."

So a set of random questions taken at random from a much larger database of facts is somehow biased?

"People who have worked their entire lives are also a "burden" on society" because the 10% he bleats on about includes all kinds of people from all walks of life"

Well that kinda means they were productive does it not?

Plus, if they have worked thier entire lives then they are above retirement age?
Hence, they are no longer productive, they are simply spending what they have from thier years of saving plus whatever the government gives them as a pension unless its private.

So to be fair, they are not a burden until those savings/pension funds run out.

It's economics 101.

Harsh, yes, but very real

 

[SamBally]

85 is considered average you numpty because the deviation is 15.


You do not even understand the basics.


If you are going to quote what you claim are "scientific facts", post the science.

 

[SamBally]

Yet again you use "Average" wrongly.
To re-iterate average is 100, the study I quoted was 85.

Come on man, do better.

"Based solely on an IQ test that decides what is IQ and what isn't."

So a set of random questions taken at random from a much larger database of facts is somehow biased?

"People who have worked their entire lives are also a "burden" on society" because the 10% he bleats on about includes all kinds of people from all walks of life"

Well that kinda means they were productive does it not?

Plus, if they have worked thier entire lives then they are above retirement age?
Hence, they are no longer productive, they are simply spending what they have from thier years of saving plus whatever the government gives them as a pension unless its private.

So to be fair, they are not a burden until those savings/pension funds run out.

It's economics 101.

Harsh, yes, but very real

There you have it. While slyly he moves the goalposts to include just about everyone else in society now as well and not just the 10% he initially claimed are a "burden" because he considers them to have a low IQ.


As far-right as far-right can get. No wonder he earlier quoted "Hitler".


Doesn't even understand the basics and don't forget he openly bragged on the boards he is a master's educated, social scientist.



LOL!

 

[SamBally]

 

[Whiskers]

Tbh ive always been Labour but do I think they would of done any better than boris no ...my reason is this was a new thing no one knew about what was gonna happen no one knew we was gonna have lockdowns...and finally everything seems to be sort of going back to normal its been so nice to take my son to away matches dont get me wrong I do wear a mask in supermarkets but that's my choice .

 

[SamBally]

"Once you get past what we laughably call an education in the UK, the only person who can teach you anything is yourself."

While he describes 10% of the population as a "burden" solely based on an IQ test created by those he mocks now and apparently that same 10% can "teach" themselves anyway to pass his silly IQ tests.



LOL!

 

[Bad_Influence]

Tbh ive always been Labour but do I think they would of done any better than boris no ...my reason is this was a new thing no one knew about what was gonna happen no one knew we was gonna have lockdowns...and finally everything seems to be sort of going back to normal its been so nice to take my son to away matches dont get me wrong I do wear a mask in supermarkets but that's my choice .

As I’m sure you’re aware I backed Boris at first. I didn’t agree with lockdown but once that path was started it had to be followed through. However, beyond the second time, it was clear that it wasn’t working, they just used their version of the science to keep us is fear.
As you say, wearing a mask is your choice, if it makes you more comfortable then so be it. I’m sure you have read the science and made up your own mind.

 

[Whiskers]

As I’m sure you’re aware I backed Boris at first. I didn’t agree with lockdown but once that path was started it had to be followed through. However, beyond the second time, it was clear that it wasn’t working, they just used their version of the science to keep us is fear.
As you say, wearing a mask is your choice, if it makes you more comfortable then so be it. I’m sure you have read the science and made up your own mind.

Always follow the science

 

[Moriarty]

Sam


Its been fun, but I'm tired and need to go to bed.

 

[Bad_Influence]

Sam


Its been fun, but I'm tired and need to go to bed.

View attachment 5326

The thing is, Shouty Man is too stupid to realise he’s stupid.

 

[SamBally]

The thing is, Shouty Man is too stupid to realise he’s stupid.

If I was you Mr Doghouse I would remove the two inappropriate pictures of children that still remain on your posts or I will report them again.

 

[Bad_Influence]

If I was you Mr Doghouse I would remove the two inappropriate pictures of children that still remain on your posts or I will report them again.

I think Double Jeapordy applies. Sorry.

 

[SamBally]

 

[vulcan]

The BBC is often attacked by the right-wing for having a favorable bias towards liberals and the left-wing. However, studies into the broadcaster’s output and coverage show that the BBC is actually biased against the left-wing of the political spectrum. This claim is backed up by the fact that many prominent political commentators and journalists at the BBC also have a background in conservative political groups.

The supposed left-wing bias of the BBC pertains mainly to criticisms by the right that the BBC has a liberal stance on issues such as immigration, Islam, feminism, gay and transgender rights. This appears to be correct — these issues are treated in a relatively liberal manner by the BBC — but that does not mean that the BBC is a liberal-leaning institution.

Rather, the BBC is a neoliberal institution; one that seeks to incorporate a very specific and narrow idea of social liberalism into the centre-right of the political spectrum — to make it appear somewhat liberal and accommodating of alternative opinions and views. The coverage and treatment of Jeremy Corbyn, his supporters, and the left by the BBC is the latest testament to the fact that they are biased in favour of this very narrow neoliberal centre-right.

The right-wing and its press, in particular, have for many years been at war with the BBC. They have persistently insisted that the BBC is biased towards liberalism and that the right is neglected, derided and ignored by liberal elites and the broadcaster.

This is mainly based on the fact that the BBC is sympathetic to coverage of issues such as immigration, and minorities. The treatment of these issues has very little to do with liberalism, and can more easily be defined as a bias towards the neoliberal view of the world — one which is ultimately on the centre-right of the political spectrum. The BBC may give liberal coverage to certain social issues — such as those of immigrants, and minorities, but that is because those views fit very neatly into the central idea of diversity that neo-liberalism has increasingly come to embrace. This, in turn, creates a facade of liberalism, but it is far from a true representation of the left.

Further to this, if the BBC was genuinely a left-liberal-biased institution then surely every Corbyn supporter in the country would be screaming from the hills with sheer delight about the massive amount of positive coverage he — and the center left are getting every day on the BBC.

Yet this isn’t happening — and the opposite claim is being made against the BBC — that they are biased towards the centre-right. This is not just a subjective claim, it has been evidenced by large-scale studies on the subject.

The researchers’ quantitative analysis of BBC News showed that critics of Corbyn were given twice as much airtime as his supporters and that the issues mobilized by his critics were given a much greater prominence. The report also noted the derogatory language BBC reporters used to describe Jeremy Corbyn, his team, and his supporters.

Full article on Evolve Politics.

Enjoy.

 

[vulcan]

The release of the Forde Inquiry’s report on its investigation into the conduct of right-wing former staff in the Labour party and the WhatsApp messages and emails revealed in a leaked Labour report last year has been delayed indefinitely. The investigation, commissioned by Sir Keir Starmer, was due to report last summer but has been repeatedly delayed amid accusations that Starmer had only ordered the investigation for the sake of appearances to appease the Corbyn supporting Labour left.

The Forde Inquiry (if it is ever released) will no doubt DEMONSTRATE the lengths the right-wing of the Labour party went to sabotage Labour's chances prior to the general election in 2017, racism and abuse, misdirection of funds and the deliberate obstruction of complaint processes.

Combined with the BBC and the MSM.

I humbly apologize but the global community of politicians, scientists, doctors, the entire world's MSM, and green lizard men from Mars are not involved in this one.

This one is just a simple case of a corrupt British establishment, rigged electoral system, and a gutter press British MSM and national broadcaster that combined forces to prevent a left-wing political ideology from being democratically elected to form government.

 

[vulcan]

Its very lefty indeed ( are you not pleased), and this accords with a very recent poll. This is why it is losing millions of licences. We need a proper Tory PM , not a Liberal soft touch such as Boris, to see it off.

 

[vulcan]

View attachment 5328

Climate change is almost synonomous with CO2 according to the pseudo climate change scientists and that dumberg lassie. it is that which I object to.

 

[vulcan]

Btw Tiddles, I noticed you yet again failed to respond to my question. You are rapidly losing all credibil

 

[vulcan]

This 2 Wails character should be beached for DIM views ( Daft Ideas Man).
Sounds like he is a closet Twatterchite..
ps. I spent a day on Twatter before being officially banned from posting, to this day. Bit of a record maybe...
I posted one thing " sleepy Joe was depriving a village somewhere of an idiot" much like the Corbynated chicken and his even madder brother. Proud to say I ruffled a few Twitter feathers...