P
Percy666
Guest
I agree with the poster stating that marriage was created from a bygone era where religion played a major role in peoples lives and it was considered abnormal to "live in sin" ie partners living together not married.
That said, if someone subscribes to the idea of marriage, I can't understand why multiple partners would be preferable as it makes a mockery of vows.. I don't believe the idea of getting married will be as relevant to future generations as taking oaths/vows in church when the vast majority dont attend churches in normal life is illogical and hypocritical. The counter argument would be of people marrying in registry offices but other than some kind of financial security provided by marriage what's the point?
That said, if someone subscribes to the idea of marriage, I can't understand why multiple partners would be preferable as it makes a mockery of vows.. I don't believe the idea of getting married will be as relevant to future generations as taking oaths/vows in church when the vast majority dont attend churches in normal life is illogical and hypocritical. The counter argument would be of people marrying in registry offices but other than some kind of financial security provided by marriage what's the point?
Last edited by a moderator: