Conspiracy Theory Addiction Is Real

[TwoWhalesInAPool]

I didn't say anything about masks other than in the context of follow scientific advice. Whereas you gibbered on like a deranged baboon, "follow the money".




School yard stuff, man child. So you haven't got, as usual, in over three years, a single shred of evidence to support a single word that you type.



The "science" (quackery) that you quoted on your "Pandemicoffear" ID unequivocally stated "50% of the population who had were vaccinated will die within two years".

How is that prediction coming along, btw?

Then yet again you incoherently ramble on about Bill Gates because as usual you have to stuff your hollow lines with something that only you think is credible and which no one else who can think for themselves does.




You have constantly claimed this in over 10,000 posts, 1,000s of YouTube videos, and to date have provided not a single shred of "scientific" evidence to support it.

"Follow the science".



I don't need to watch anything you spam post from YouTube, Christopher, to know that you do not understand science.

 

[TwoWhalesInAPool]

He genuinely, and it isn't even an act, in his booze fuelled existence, petulantly demands that other people watch the entirety of the THOUSANDS of random videos that he spams, from the creepy sites he spends all his time on, and to then "prove" him wrong.

Doesn't understand academia, doesn't understand science.



HaHaHa.

 

[TwoWhalesInAPool]

 

[Brass]

You suck the energy off the boards . . .

What's sucking the life out of this thread is your chronic refusal to actually discuss the issue. For instance, when I ask you whether or not you believe that the experimental injection prevents infection or transmission, you refuse to answer. So why don't you answer that question so that we know where you're coming from. That's how debate works.

So, in the interest of not sucking the life out of this place, why don't you just answer the question and stop protecting your false beliefs.

We're all just oh so curious to know your answer to the question of whether or not you believe the experimental injection prevents infection or transmission. In reality, you do understand what you're being asked, and you do know the answer. But you have to pretend that you don't understand the question because if you acknowledge the fact that they do not prevent infection or transmission, you know that the next question will be why you're willing to take something that doesn't work for something you don't have anyway.

So why don't you stop sucking the life out of this place with your belligerent posturing. If you don't like answering questions concerning the contradictory nature of your beliefs, then what are you doing here?

So, now that you have a better understanding of how discussion and debate works, do you believe that the experimental injection prevents infection or transmission? Simple yes or no . . .

 

[TwoWhalesInAPool]

PART TWENTY TWO (A)

Bored to fears: Boredom proneness, Paranoia, and Conspiracy Theories

Conspiracy theories have recently become the focus of increasing attention from psychologists.

The terms “conspiracy theorist” and “paranoid” are often used when referring to people who are suspicious of other people’s intentions, doubt the veracity of historical events, or who think that important governmental and scientific decisions are part of secret plots orchestrated by powerful others.

People high in paranoid ideation are typically hypervigilant towards signs of hostility directed towards themselves, and are inclined towards misinterpreting innocuous social interactions as aggressive.

Conspiracist ideation is associated with low self-efficacy, lack of self-esteem, dissatisfaction with life, and anxiety, both as a temporary state, or a stable individual difference.

A primary finding is that individuals who believe one conspiracy theory tend to believe others – even theories that are logically unrelated, mutually contradictory, or entirely fabricated by researchers.

Research has begun to reveal personality factors associated with conspiracist ideation, suggesting there may be a ‘conspiracy-prone’ personality type (or types). Conspiracism appears to be associated with other anomalous beliefs and experiences.

Believers may be drawn to conspiracy theories as a satisfying justification for their perceived lack of power over their own circumstances.

Of particular interest to the current research, however, a number of prior studies suggest that conspiracist ideation is associated with paranoia.

A number of other studies demonstrate associations between conspiracism and traits related to paranoia, including mistrust, pessimism, hostility, cynicism, defiance of authority, impulsive nonconformity, and low agreeableness.

However findings suggest that boredom proneness is related to belief in conspiracy theories; however, the relationship is mediated by paranoia.

These findings add to the growing literature on conspiracist ideation, as well as our understanding of boredom proneness and paranoia.

 

[Kev45]

What's sucking the life out of this thread is your chronic refusal to actually discuss the issue.

You clearly did not, and nor can you, understand, what was written directly to you previously on this thread.


You believe Bill Gates controls the world, I believe you are stark raving bonkers, and so a conversation between us never going to lead anywhere, ever, is it?

 

[Brass]

PART TWENTY TWO (A)
The terms “conspiracy theorist” and “paranoid” are often used when referring to people who are suspicious of other people’s intentions . . .

So, what name would you apply to yourself for mindlessly insisting that though the experimental injection does not prevent infection and transmission, it will nonetheless keep you from spreading it to those around you?

I would call that kind of lack of reasoning willful ignorance.

 

[Kev45]

So, what name would you apply to yourself for mindlessly insisting that though the experimental injection does not prevent infection and transmission, it will nonetheless keep you from spreading it to those around you?

I would call that kind of lack of reasoning willful ignorance.

I would call your obsessive behaviour extremely concerning. You have typed this allegation 49 times in the past few days. The first time, no one responded, but yet you repeated it another 48 times. At no point have you provided evidence to support your claim.

Ignorance indeed.

 

[Kev45]

Deflection yet again.

You can repeatedly type "deflection" all you like, Christopher, obsessively 100s of times and like your latest sidekick. It changes the facts not one single iota. You have no valid scientific evidence to support your thesis, and you do not understand that science.

 

[Brass]

You clearly did not, and nor can you, understand, what was written directly to you previously on this thread.

There is no sane explanation for why you would take something that doesn't do what you believe it does. Nowhere has anyone explained the wisdom of that kind of reasoning. However, I now believe that you actually believe that, somewhere on these boards such stupidity was shown to not be stupid at all. Of course, if that were true, you'd have directed me to that discussion. Or maybe you're just about to do that . . .

 

[Kev45]

There is no sane explanation for why you would take something that doesn't do what you believe it does.

Not once have I directly stated to you what I believe or what I don't believe. This is the problem with you lunatics, you make ungrounded assumptions based on your own fear and paranoia.

 

[Kev45]

What do hope to gain by repeating my name?

What do you hope to gain spamming 1,000s of YouTube videos, on an open forum, and then repeatedly typing "prove me wrong"?

Post scientific evidence to back up your infantile claims, and then we can put the matter to rest once and for all.

 

[Kev45]

Answer the question. Have some self-respect fella.

Provide evidence.

 

[Brass]

You have typed this allegation 49 times in the past few days. The first time, no one responded, but yet you repeated it another 48 times. At no point have you provided evidence to support your claim.

And 49 times no one answered the question of why they take something that doesn't prevent infection or transmission so that those around them won't catch it. Why are you not answering that?

Tell me you believe the experimental injection prevents infection and transmission. You need to take one position or another, so which is it?

 

[Kev45]

You need to accept one premise or another, so which is it?

I don't need to accept any of the paranoid sh*te you post, and in fact I don't. You make assumptions because you are incapable of answering your own question. 49 times.