A mothers love.

[hell2bwith76]

You make excuses for men and blame women, it's an ongoing theme with you....pathetic.

Just add a few more hahaha's to your posts, it's about the only level of conversation you can cope with.

Well ,you and your fellow womens lib followers are only worthy of a "hahahhaahah"

 

[hell2bwith76]

You make excuses for men and blame women, it's an ongoing theme with you....pathetic.

Just add a few more hahaha's to your posts, it's about the only level of conversation you can cope with.

What`s the difference between having one mistress and having several masters ? Ahhh yes ,could i be "STD" ???

 

[Saphire]

Royal insiders are worried, that as the queen now needs more help in getting around when she is out and about, Andrew (because he seemingly hasn't got much else going for him nowadays) will be called to escort the queen to some of her jubilee events, including escorting her to and at the Epsom Derby, later in the year.

 

[Saphire]

Surely she can afford a ‘granny-scooter’? That has to be a less controversial option that having ‘Handsy-Andy’ (I kept that clean) by her side?

Not really regal enough, but how about an adaptation of a little popemobile?
It could be fancied up.....fit for a queen.

 

[Saphire]

That’s a plan. Maybe a bit of gold trim, go-faster stripes (or ‘80s flames), a gun turret for the obligatory secret services bloke, and copious number of union flags. Oh and ensure the driver is not a French chauffeur. Lol.

I imagine the average French chauffeur would be fit for purpose.
Hopefully he would avoid any tunnels with conveniently 'out of order' CCTV cameras though.

 

[Saphire]

Ya just a fecking conspiracy theorist, tinfoil hat wearing nutter. Lol

Sometimes, branding factual evidence as conspiracy theory has the advantage of persuasion....not in this case though.

 

[Saphire]

I’m saying nuffink. But I hear Charles has been taking sniper training. Can’t think why though. Lol.

Maybe he is bored with his present wife?

Just kidding.

 

[Saphire]

That would be a little too obvious surely? Lol

I agree.

 

[Whiskers]

Hes a shovenistic pig end of story he's one of these blokes who think it's perfectly OK for a man to have an affair Diana was used u stupid man...but u won't agree becos u think a woman should be seen and not heard!
The lady is dead have some respect!

 

[Moriarty]

Hes a shovenistic pig end of story he's one of these blokes who think it's perfectly OK for a man to have an affair Diana was used u stupid man...but u won't agree becos u think a woman should be seen and not heard!
The lady is dead have some respect!

I have plenty of respect for Diana.
Her handling of the media was masterful.
Her public portrayal of herself was a work of art.

There was a lot more to her than people saw.
She was a troubled soul, in an unhappy marraige, yet she fulfilled the role intended of her.
She birthed heirs to the throne.

But please dont think for one minute she was simply a victim.
Her biggest failing was her success with the "Common" people.

She cultivated that.
It's how she protected herself.

If Diana was ever allowed to write memoirs, there would be to much sh** thrown at the wall, some of it would have stuck.

Someone silenced her, whether it had royal consent or not, it happened.

I would not be suprised if it had nothing to do with the royals directly, but some misplaced belief in various intelligence agencies or powerful NGO's in concert that led to her "Accident".

Edit spelling

 

[hell2bwith76]

Charles is a nodding dog who did everything his father told him to. How he manages to even put his trousers on the right way now Phil isn’t around is beyond me.

Firstly Charles had a very sad childhood if you read the story .His Mother left him went to foreign countries as an Ambassidor for this country and he had a very sharp Father plus a nanny who he(Charles) loved . Philip made him go to a (military)College which wasn`t fitting for him as he was (is) a gentle sort of person. I think some of you need to the facts of Charles upbringing right before you make such critical remarks about him.

Secondly ,what the fk is all the rambling about and who is it aimed at by Whisky ?
You saying that Charles is a Chauvanist pig? I think you have your "Princes" a bit mixed up lady.

 

[hell2bwith76]

I have plenty of respect for Diana.
Her handling of the media was masterful.
Her public portrayal of herself was a work of art.

There was a lot more to her than people saw.
She was a troubled soul, in an unhappy marraige, yet she fulfilled the role intended of her.
She birthed heirs to the throne.

But please dont think for one minute she was simply a victim.
Her biggest failing was her success with the "Common" people.

She cultivated that.
It's how she protected herself.

If Diana was ever allowed to write memoirs, there would be to much sh** thrown at the wall, some of it would have stuck.

Someone silenced her, whether it had royal consent or not, it happened.

I would not be suprised if it had nothing to do with the royals directly, but some misplaced belief in various intelligence agencies or powerful NGO's in concert that led to her "Accident".

Edit spelling

Load of old Cobblers !! if she wore a seatbelt she might still be alive . Read the story of her Parents and maybe you`ll see more than you obviously know about Dianna. They were instrumental in pushing her to marry Charles !