A day in the life of Paul Conservative.

[Kev45]

Paul gets up for work at 6am and fills his kettle to prepare his morning cuppa. The water is clean because some woke tree-hugger fought for minimum water-quality standards. Paul prepares his bacon and eggs, and the bacon is safe to eat because some girly-man liberal fought for laws to regulate the meat industry.

During his morning shower, Paul reaches for his Lynx shower gel, The bottle is labelled with each ingredient because some crybaby socialist fought for his right to know what he is putting on his body and how much it contains. Paul dresses, walks outside and takes a deep breath. The air is clean because some environmentalist leftie fought for laws to stop local industry from polluting the air he breathes.

Paul drives to work in a safe, regulated car, because meddling woke do-gooders fought for more safety features and standards on road vehicles, and well lit tarmacked roads. Paul begins his work day. He has a good job with excellent pay, pension, paternity leave, paid holidays and sick pay because some lazy unionist whiners fought and died for these working standards. Paul unfortunately hurt himself at work, tripped on a stair, and an ambulance promptly arrives to take him to A&E. He receives free-at-the-point-of-use treatment thanks to some interfering bloody trots who only went and decided creating a national health service was a good idea.

Paul ends his working day by relaxing while he listens to the radio at home, a home built to a minimum standard by workers protected by health and safety rules that some crazy trots fought for. The radio host reminds everyone that left wing politics are dangerous and that only the Conservatives can be trusted. Neglecting to mention, only the Conservatives have fought tooth and nail against every single protection and benefit Paul has enjoyed throughout his day.

Paul agrees, "None of us need these woke big-government socialists ruining our lives! Interfering. After all, I am a self-made man who believes everyone should take care of themselves, just like I have."

 

[Kev45]

Most of the changes you described were brought about after campaigns by family's or legal action.

All changes brought about by either and liberals, left wing governments or the trade union movement.

We've come a long way since 70's and anti-racism and pro-LGBT measures seem a little out dated. The truth is most of theses communities only face prejudice from mostly immigrates & over 60's.

"Homophobic and transphobic hate crimes reported to police in the UK rose sharply after lockdown restrictions eased, new data shows.

The number of hate crimes related to sexual orientation hit the highest monthly level since the pandemic began in June.

At least 14,670 sexual orientation hate crime offences were recorded from January to August 2021, compared with 11,841 in the same period of 2020 and 10,817 in 2019.

While offences averaged 1,456 a month from January to April this year, they jumped to 2,211 on average from May to August."

Immigrate on immigrate violence is on the increase and due to "woke" government rules its hard to find the true numbers involved.

Does anyone know what an "immigrate" is?

The majority of knife crime in the UK is committed by "British" boys or men.

If the 7 billion spending figure on "woke" project is correct....

Which it isn't unless you have evidence to back up your accusation. And even if it is true, it has proven benefits to our society in comparison to a Conservative government TRIPLING national debt.

To put it into perspective its less than giving NHS workers the pay rise there soon to go on strike for. So lets stop giving job centre staff "diversity" training and give our nurses a decent pay rise for once.

The Conservative government refuses to increase public sector pay because it argues it will increase inflation, a separate argument altogether.

 

[LadyOnArooftop]

I hope Paul isn't waiting for a train to go to work because he'll have a long wait. If he's walking to work I pray he doesn't have an accident as it may take 24 hours for an ambulance to turn up. If he'd been expecting the postman to bring him some Christmas cards to cheer him up - he'll be sadly
disappointed. If he's on the waiting list for a much needed operation - it's got longer. And no chance of getting away for a holiday - the passport staff wont be in attendance. I'm just hoping Paul's own union doesn't jump on the striking bandwagon! These union barons have no consideration for others, I mean, the border force are now going on strike - who will ferry the illegal immigrants across the channel now? - I'm appalled, absolutely appalled.

 

[Kev45]

I think 15k isn't too shabby for a population of 65 million.

You think 550 attacks a month between May and August "isn't too shabby"?

Tensions between Indians & Pakistans communities in the north have increase too.

No, actually they haven't, at least not where I live in Manchester and surrounding towns. You also
undermine your own argument. If 550 violent attacks a month on the LGBT community does not concern you, then why does a handful of incidences between those two communities concern you so much?


Why don't you just man up and state it concerns you because of the colour of their skin?

I'm actually say what I mean here. Black on black drug violence is on the increase.

You just argued it was "immigrates", you seem to believe anyone who doesn't look like you is an "immigrate".

Diversity training is about the same.

You clearly don't understand what diversity training is, and most large organisations, including the private sector, utilise it in some form or other.

Errr I think that's more to do with insurant companies not wanting to pay out rather than people power.

So you believe the NHS and all the other examples I gave came about because of insurance companies.

 

[Moriarty]

You think 550 attacks a month between May and August "isn't too shabby"?



No, actually they haven't, at least not where I live in Manchester and surrounding towns. You also
undermine your own argument. If 550 violent attacks a month on the LGBT community does not concern you, then why does a handful of incidences between those two communities concern you so much?


Why don't you just man up and state it concerns you because of the colour of their skin?



You just argued it was "immigrates", you seem to believe anyone who doesn't look like you is an "immigrate".



You clearly don't understand what diversity training is, and most large organisations, including the private sector, utilise it in some form or other.



So you believe the NHS and all the other examples I gave came about because of insurance companies.

How many White, heterosexual men were attacked in that given time frame?
How many Black, heterosexual men were attacked in that given time frame?
How many Asain, heterosexual men were attacked in that given time frame?

How many of the LGBT community were attacked by thier own?
Why is LGBT partner violence higher than heterosexual partner violence?

These are complex questions without easy answers.
Yes some LGBT people get attacked by heterosexual people.
Yes they get attacked by bigots sometimes because they show affection which some see as "Abnormal".
Those are the ones than can be changed.
But you simply use figures in a haphazard way.

Violence between LGBT partners is a major problem which is not being looked at as it is not politically viable.
Questions surrounding that subject are not being tackled.

 

[Kev45]

How many White, heterosexual men were attacked in that given time frame?
How many Black, heterosexual men were attacked in that given time frame?
How many Asain, heterosexual men were attacked in that given time frame?

It's irrelevant, we were not comparing or discussing violence in general. The original claim (not by me) was quite specific, that the violence and discrimination the LGBT community are subjected has improved since the 70s and therefore is not a big deal now. I responded with evidence that thousands' of people from the LGBT community were abused and assaulted each month, and which was then glibly dismissed and described as "not too shabby".

These are complex questions without easy answers.

No question was asked, it isn't complex at all, in fact it is really rather simple. 550 members of the LGBT community were subjected to violence each month between May and August. That is a fact. I didn't introduce the LGBT topic and was merely responding in kind. That is also a fact.

But you simply use figures in a haphazard way.

I have no idea what you are getting so hysterical about. I only used those simple figures in response to a simple claim made by someone else, but since you are trying to bullshit the thread, let me offer you some advice. Learn how to follow a conversation without attempting to look clever and when in fact you just look incredibly stupid.

Violence between LGBT partners is a major problem which is not being looked at as it is not politically viable.
Questions surrounding that subject are not being tackled.

It must be a major problem, just because you say so. I doubt it is a major problem in direct comparison to the other groups you mention. Another turnip who undermines his own argument. Of course, though, I am happy to be led to a link that supports your claim.

 

[Moriarty]

It's irrelevant, we were not comparing or discussing violence in general. The original claim (not by me) was quite specific, that the violence and discrimination the LGBT community are subjected has improved since the 70s and therefore is not a big deal now. I responded with a link that thousands' of people from the LGBT community were abused and assaulted each month and which was then glibly dismissed and described as "not too shabby".



No question was asked, it isn't complex at all, in fact it is really rather simple. 550 members of the LGBT community were subjected to violence each month between May and August. That is a fact. I didn't introduce the LGBT topic and was merely responding in kind. That is also a fact.


I have no idea what you are getting so hysterical about. I only used those simple figures in response to a simple claim made by someone else, but since you are trying to bullshit the thread, let me offer you some advice. Learn how to follow a conversation without attempting to look clever and when in fact you just look incredibly stupid.



It must be a major problem, just because you say so. I doubt it is a major problem in direct comparison to the other groups you mention. Another turnip who undermines his own argument. Of course, though, I am happy to be led to a link that supports your claim.

So with all that.
You actually said.. Nothing.
Congrats.

Now formulate an argument, come back with some data then we can discuss reality.

Edit, spelt congrats wrong, ffs.
Being pedantic, should it not be congratulations, but.. Internet..

 

[Kev45]

So with all that.
You actually said.. Nothing.
Contratz.

Now formulate an argument, come back with some data then we can discuss reality.

I don't need to say anything regarding a topic that wasn't raised, you put words in my mouth that I didn't actually say. I have in fact provided data, and you have provided none at all. That data won't materialise because you are bullshitting.

 

[PennyDreadful2]

It makes you not want to get up in the morning!

 

[Moriarty]

I don't need to say anything regarding a topic that wasn't raised, you put words in my mouth that I didn't actually say. I have in fact provided data, and you have provided none at all. That data won't materialise because you are bullshitting.

"I don't need to say anything regarding a topic that wasn't raised"

In other words, you said nothing, just a simple attempt to derail an actual discussion.

I would love to see your data, can you provide a link?

 

[Kev45]

"I don't need to say anything regarding a topic that wasn't raised"

In other words, you said nothing, just a simple attempt to derail an actual discussion.

I would love to see your data, can you provide a link?

Derail a conversation that I started when I wrote this thread, and that you tried derailing with irrelevant bullshit? You can thrust your stinky bony groin in my direction as much as you like, however, I still won't engage with a bullshitter who typed some random baloney and who then demanded a response like a petulant child.

 

[Kev45]

So let me get this straight, ‘Kev’ started a thread then when brought up on clearly relevant points, points that he himself replied to previously, he now refuses to engage in the conversation he started because he claims it’s ‘bullshit’?
Typical response from a Wokeist nutter, they do hate to be called out, no evidence to back up his claims of BS, but if he shouts loud enough he thinks people will listen. ‘Kev’ is like the love child of Greta and Kier. Lol

Let's talk about you, which I know is your favourite subject. You recently posted a link to a site that denies the holocaust, considers other races as inferior, and which has just been closed down by the authorities for hate crime and the owner subsequently charged.

Just like pongy, no one wants to engage with either of you, I wonder why?

 

[Kev45]

Is he going to respond, after all it's only "debate"?

 

[Kev45]

Did I post any article that denied the Holocaust, or that stated other races are inferior? I very much doubt I did.

I didn't say you did. Do try and follow the line of conversation, which you just had so much to say about. You post links to white supremacist sites that deny the holocaust and consider other races inferior. You are 100% a scumbag.