Why I don't trust the Bible.

[A_Son_of_God]

If you want to follow a Pauline religion then that's up to you, but the Jesus reported in G-Mark was a totally different person.

Oh. Okay.
Show me. Show me how it differs in this set of scriptures.

 

[A_Son_of_God]

Peter? Can you see how far from Jesus you all are?
Jesus called him Cephas, and never used any name like Petros.

Again. Show me. Show me the writings of Jesus. Show me what Jesus wrote down, Sr Experte.

 

[Smew]

Oh. Okay.
Show me. Show me how it differs in this set of scriptures.

Scriptures?
Paul wrote LETTERS to various congregations.
G-Mark is a description of the ONE YEAR that Jesus spent in trying to build up a movement against Temple and Leader corruption and greed, which was nothing like Paul's religion which was based upon superstitious waffle. The last verses of Mark were tacked on the the whole, Jesus was estranged from his family (as shown so clearly) how actions in the Temple show exactly what he intended.

Paul? Paul built Christianity.

 

[Smew]

Again. Show me. Show me the writings of Jesus. Show me what Jesus wrote down, Sr Experte.

Show me where I have claimed that Jesus could write.
Sr Experte? That's nasty.

 

[A_Son_of_God]

but the Jesus reported in G-Mark was a totally different person.

Show me where, in this G-Mark of yours.

Jesus called him Cephas, and never used any name like Petros.

Again, show me where.
Sr. Experte. How is that mean? You're an expert, right? So, show me. Don't make up claims with no back up. I posted scriptures and reasoned on them. You're only posting opinions on things you've heard. So, considering you know about this G-Mark document, post what it says, and then show me how Jesus never used Peter. Until you produce REAL evidence - a quote, for instance, with a link I can look at, you're not a true expert. You're "experte" until you demonstrate your worth.
Because once you do, I'll show you where he DID call him Peter. Your motive is not to learn nor teach, but to fight.
In the old days, you could have had your chance. But two things. I don't fight any more, and I'm getting too old to be a belligerant old fool. So you'll have to go and pick a fight with someone at the bus stop instead. Or take up hooliganism. But if you want to debate, then present your points and evidence. Otherwise, what are you actually doing? Why?

 

[A_Son_of_God]

Scriptures?
Paul wrote LETTERS to various congregations.

As mentioned, Peter - the apostle of Jesus, who you are criticising because PETER said it and not Jesus - stated Paul's letters as godly wisdom. So you're arguing against the "pattern of healthful teaching".

G-Mark is a description of the ONE YEAR that Jesus spent in trying to build up a movement against Temple and Leader corruption and greed,

Again. If you're going to claim what it is, show it. Look, here's an example. Jesus says that "“Then people will hand you over to tribulation and will kill you, and you will be hated by all the nations on account of my name. Then, too, many will be stumbled and will betray one another and will hate one another. Many false prophets will arise and mislead many". That came from this scripture. Matthew 24:9-11.
So, please show where this G-Mark says what you're claiming.

which was nothing like Paul's religion which was based upon superstitious waffle.

Please support your claim. Do you have any, or are you just a big mouth? Flapping your gums, blablabla, with no evidence. A bottle in the wind?

The last verses of Mark were tacked on the the whole

This part, you are correct on. We know when it was added in. Therefore, we know it should be removed. Here's an article showing how we know when it was added in.

, Jesus was estranged from his family (as shown so clearly)

No mate. Just because his family didn't accept him as the Messiah, other than his mother and stepfather, doesn't mean he was estranged from them. There are many scriptures showing that his brothers and sisters visited him.

Paul? Paul built Christianity.

He was certainly a big part.

 

[A_Son_of_God]

the people who believe nothing created everything, when the properties of nothing means it doesn't exist are the winners. congratulations for winning your case.

LOL A faith in nothing, with nothing as the future. Well, they will be right if they stick to it.