WickedPerdition
Chat Celebrity of the Decade*.
- Joined
- Dec 22, 2019
- Messages
- 1,312
- Reaction score
- 672
Why you are engaging in SOMETHING that I was reluctant to qualify in the first place worries me.In this sentence I suspect WP was referring to the cat as an 'it'.
Cats are referred to as an 'it' in the english language (as any other animal).
How many of you refer to a cow, pig, horse or any other animal, bird, insect ot fish which doesn't belong to you as a 'she' or 'he'?
Very few, I suspect.
It's the emotional attachment which changes an 'it' into a 'she' or 'he' .
However I'm not 100% sure that 'something' is grammatically correct in that context.
From the web:
Definition of something as a pronoun:
1b: some indeterminate amount more than a specified number, used in combination
2: a person or thing of consequence
3 : one having more or less the character, qualities, or nature of something different
something else
: something or someone special or extraordinary
Definition of something as an adverb:
1: in some degree : SOMEWHAT
2: used as an intensive giving adverbial force to an adjective
You really should read the thread in full, otherwise you miss out on what preceded. When you are attempting semantics with me you are assuredly on to a loser. I think before I type. Sadly, it would appear that you don't. 'From the Web' ... undoubtedly your infallible source.
The upshot of the 'argument' is that a cat IS NOT HUMAN, regardless of how many cartoon depictions make you believe that it is.
Because a cat IS a thing it can be referred to as some thing. However, the same CANNOT be applied to humans.
I see that you have failed to delete your account. I won't be the only one amused by your failure to do so.
Oh, and don't tell me; you own a 'fucking' cat! Next ineffectual interloper, please ....