Far-right snowflake meltdown, in 3, 2, 1...

[TwoWhalesInAPool]

Dunning Kruger moron who claims it’s ridiculous for trans women to self-identify as ‘women’ perfectly happy for the Nazis to self-identify as ‘socialists’​

A moron has today insisted that the Nazis were socialists, because it was their chosen name, despite insisting that self-identification is a ‘cancer on society’.

Ray Cyst-Mowrun, 55, a prime example of the Dunning Kruger effect, is a staunch believer that pronouns are the work of the devil, and you can’t change who you are just by changing your title. He does however believe that the Nazis were socialists because they put the word socialist in their full title, which is “National Socialist German Workers’ Party”.

Ray told us, “You can’t become a woman just by changing your name to Dierdre and then changing everything about how you life your life. It’s a joke. If you’re a man, you’re a man.

“But yes, the Nazis were socialists. It says right there in the name. I don’t care that their entire system of government was against socialist ideals, I still believe it. I don’t care if you point to Sweden or Norway as examples of modern socialist governments; I will still use a completely inaccurate eighty-year-old organisation as the true definition of socialism.”

However, non-morons have reacted with a rather large sigh.

One such non-moron, Toow Hales, told us, “It really isn’t complicated, and anyone arguing that the reverse is therefore also true – i.e. that if Nazis aren’t socialists then transwomen aren’t women – hasn’t really thought about it. It doesn’t really matter what you call yourself; your behaviour is what defines you. And if you’re living your entire life as a woman, then I don’t have any real issue with you calling yourself a woman.

“But if you’re clinging to fascistic ideals, imprisoning people who disagree with you, and launching wave after wave of attacks on the people around you, then it’s a bit of a stretch to claim you’re a socialist. The Nazis were no more socialist than North Korea is democratic simply because it’s called the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea.”
TY@NT

 

[TwoWhalesInAPool]

In a flurry of hate filled far right snowflake hypocrisy a moron who claims 15-year-old Shamima Begum knew exactly what she was doing insists that the 17-year-old at heart of BBC presenter row was clearly groomed and didn’t understand he was being exploited.​

A far right snowflake racist 68-year-old Basingstoke man has today insisted the 17-year-old at the heart of the BBC presenter row should not be listened to, because 17-year-olds are easily exploited, and he was clearly groomed, despite repeatedly insisting that 15-year-old Shamima Begum “should rot” because she knew exactly what she was doing when she was two years younger than him.

After reports emerged that lawyers representing the youngster had issued a statement denying that anything illegal happened and that they told The Sun precisely that before they went to print, many people are still keen to assume the BBC is covering up something awful.

Ray Cyst-Omofobe, 55, told us, “We should not be swayed by the words of the young person who may have sold these photos. Definitely not.

“Just because he says he wasn’t exploited, and that nothing untoward or illegal happened, doesn’t mean he’s right. 17-year-olds know nothing of the real world, and I have no doubt he was completely exploited by one of the many sick perverts at the BBC. It is the obvious explanation.

“At 17, he should have been protected like the child he so clearly was. Not like that evil harridan Shemima Begum, who knew EXACTLY what she was doing at 15. Of course she knew who she was joining. Some 15-year-olds have a 30-year-old head on their shoulders, and she’s one of them.

“You might think my opinions on these two teenagers point to rampant hypocrisy, but you’re wrong. I am completely consistent. Shamima Begum voluntarily joined ISIS, which I hate, whereas this 17-year-old was exploited by someone at the BBC, which I also hate. That’s why I treat them completely differently.

“I am definitely right about this; shut up.”

TY@NT

 

[Moriarty]

The nazi's were socialists.
Shamima Begum should be given her day in court without prejudice.
I may be wrong but the law states sharing sexually explicit photographs is illegal under the age of 18.

Whatever happens, the guy they are accusing has his right to a trial.
Especially considering the young persons legal representative has already said there is no case to be made and refuted all charges.

 

[Kev45]

A penniless crack addict (allegedly) states, via his/her legal representation, that the man who paid (groomed) him/her £35,000 for a few mucky pictures has done absolutely nothing wrong.

Democratic People's Republic of Korea is a republican democratic state in East Asia.

 

[TwoWhalesInAPool]

Leaked document reveals Labour plan to nationalise the Conservative Party​

A leaked Labour policy memo contains a pledge to take the Conservative Party into public ownership by 2025.

The document describes the party as ‘not fit for purpose’ and emblematic of a society which puts profits before people.

Nationalising the party would be one of the party’s first acts when elected, pledging to end the Conservative Party's history of ripping off consumers within 100 days of entering Downing Street.

Shareholders will not be compensated, the speech says.

“The Conservative Party exists to make millions for its shareholders whilst ripping off ordinary people,” leader Keir Starmer will tell by-election campaigners.

“I don’t think it is unreasonable to suggest it should be run for the benefit of the people, and not its private backers.

“By taking the Tories into public ownership, we could ensure they serve a social purpose for the first time in their existence.”

The venerable organisation has been privately-owned for more than two hundred years, during which time it has returned substantial profits to shareholders but is widely seen as having failed to adequately address customer needs.

Under Labour’s proposals, the Conservative Party would be administered as a democratic cooperative run by workers, rather than the current unaccountable fat cats and business interests.

Historically, this has made things better every time it has been tried.
TY@NT

 

[TwoWhalesInAPool]

Man who typically sneers at ‘snowflakes’ demands you stop making jokes on the anniversary of the Queen’s death​

A man who usually moans that ‘you can’t joke about anything these days’ is begging you to stop making a joke he personally doesn’t like.

Stew Pydcunt, 59, typically comments on misogynistic, racist and/or homophobic social media posts to tell anyone who doesn’t like it to “shut up, snowflake. Get a sense of humour.”

However, the tables have seemingly turned after Pydcunt logged onto social media and saw people making jokes on the first anniversary of the Queen’s death.

“It’s DISKUSTENG!” confirmed Pydcunt, speaking as he would type.

“The woman DIED. Show some respect, even if you don’t respect her, or particularly like her, which you absolutely SHOULD. Everybody should respect and like the same people as me.

“You should take this down. I don’t like this joke, so you should take it down. That’s how the world should work.

“What? No, I’m not a snowflake, how dare you.

“I’m complaining against something IMPORTANT, not stupid things that have no societal impact like jokes about gays or ethnic minorities. THOSE things are funny. They’re fine, because they’re not important to ME.

“But the Queen IS important to me, so you need to stop.

“Once again, definitely not a snowflake. But please stop.”

TY@NT

 

[TwoWhalesInAPool]

What's more "extreme":

Believing that children should have enough food to eat?

Or refusing to tax the super-rich while 4.2 million kids live in poverty?

- Jeremy Corbyn.

 

[TwoWhalesInAPool]

Just in case there’s any confusion, the people who want control over what perfectly innocuous flags other people can wave in the Albert Hall are obviously the real ‘free speech’ champions. And definitely not ‘snowflakes’. -JOB

 

[TwoWhalesInAPool]

“Free speech means companies must be forced to give money to TV channels I like” insists snowflake right wing gammon​

GB News fan and borderline simpleton, Ray Cyst, 66, is today insisting that free speech means that free-market commercial enterprises must be forced to give money to his favourite television channels.

As the fledgeling racist entertainment channel for angry morons found that a number of organisations had pulled adverts from their airwaves, Cyst insisted this is basically the same as the Nazis burning books.

He explained, “Yes, I can see how that analogy might look ridiculous to the untrained eye, but when you’re as familiar as I am with the concept of free speech, you’ll realise that commercial organisations doing whatever they think is best for their bottom line is basically Marxism.

“We can not stand by and let these companies advertise only in places where they feel the adverts will best resonate with their customer base. The next step will be to send those of us who commit thought-crimes to the gulag – you mark my words.”

Advertising executive Mike Dawson told us, “The idea that companies are doing anything other than trying desperately to separate you from your cash is frankly laughable.

“That said, these radicalised GB News free speech fanatics are actually quite profitable, just not quite in the way they think they are.

“Being targeted by the ‘go woke go broke’ lot is pretty lucrative. Just ask Nike, whose profits doubled the year they ran the Colin Kaepernick campaign and found themselves at the centre of a ‘go woke go broke’ protest. Or Grind coffee, who doubled revenues when GB News’ own far right moron Laurence Fox tried to cancel them.

“Honestly, I’ve got brands queuing up to run a single ad on GB News just so they can pull the rest of them and benefit from the free publicity.

“Apparently nothing makes money quite like triggering the gammonati.”

TY@NT