megs233
UKChat Celebrity
- Joined
- Jan 4, 2018
- Messages
- 2,008
- Reaction score
- 1,086
for what? we dont choose to suffer pain!!the idea is we were given
choices..
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
for what? we dont choose to suffer pain!!the idea is we were given
choices..
we have choicewhy would a GOD any God let people suffer?.
we choose to inflict painfor what? we dont choose to suffer pain!!
nthing to do with who believes in god is it but like i said if was a person he wont let us suffer.we choose to inflict pain
well I guess 'GOD' is an it not a he or she and as we inflict pain so we suffer pain. Nothin to do with any god.nthing to do with who believes in god is it but like i said if was a person he wont let us suffer.
probably because Jesus sufferednthing to do with who believes in god is it but like i said if was a person he wont let us suffer.
God is saying here that children are innocent and will be in heaven.God has an age of accountability.Theologians agree it appears to be around 13-14....... and he said suffer little children unto me.... Gods word, its in the bible.
The law of gravity describes the relation between bodies. Those bodies already exist. This law creates nothing.
Im bored now
I heard that lecture and read Krauss's book "a universe from nothing" about four years ago. In essence, Krauss argues that the universe could come from nothing, which he defines as a quantum vacuum. He believes this undermines the need for a Creator. In response to Krauss: First, a quantum vacuum is not nothing. The nothing of Krauss has a number of properties. Indeed, Krauss himself concedes this. He writes: "It would be disingenuous to suggest that empty space, endowed with energy, which drives inflation, is really nothing. In this picture one must assume that space exists and can store energy, and one uses the laws of physics like general relativity to calculate the consequences." I believe Parmenides may have been right. Absolute nothing may be impossible to conceive or express. This is my sense of nothing. I reject Krauss's notion that science dictates what words mean.
Second, Krauss suggests how the universe could have arisen. He offers a hypothesis, which I have no more reason to believe than the fundamental postulate of string theory, that everything is composed of infinitesimal strings, which vibrate at different frequencies in 10 dimensions.
Finally, even if Krauss had explained where the visible universe came from, he has still not answered Parmenides's principle of sufficient reason (PSR). If the macroscale demands explanation, why not the quantum vacuum? This is comparable to attempts of atheist physicists like Victor Stenger to explain fine-tuned phenomena. In his book The Fallacy of Fine-tuning, Stenger used inflation to explain the improbable isotropy of the cosmic microwave background (CMB). However, the parameters of inflation are just as improbable as this initial state of the universe. Thus inflation fails to resolve what he sought to explain. The same problem just shifts to inflation. And even if inflation is true (physicists and cosmologists express grave doubts about this theory), the question then becomes: why does inflation give rise to this improbable isotropy of the CMB? Likewise, Krauss's hypothesis of a quantum vacuum just drives the PSR a step back. One could still ask Krauss: where did the quantum vacuum come from? I think Jude99 is ultimately right. We still need a deeper explanation. And whilst empiricists rest with appearances, others view these as shadows of reality.
why would a GOD any God let people suffer?.
probably because Jesus suffered
You either believe or you dont......I think it depends very much on your early years and upbringing.