Yeah, we know the extent of your ideas.I have no idea where you cut and pasted this from, plagiarized, randomly threw it into the mix, and again no source.
Taking all of these factors into account, it is not surprising that none of the predominantly mucosal respiratory viruses have ever been effectively controlled by vaccines. This observation raises a question of fundamental importance: if natural mucosal respiratory virus infections do not elicit complete and long-term protective immunity against reinfection, how can we expect vaccines, especially systemically administered non-replicating vaccines, to do so? This is a major challenge for future vaccine development, and overcoming it is critical as we work to develop “next-generation” vaccines.
Rethinking next-generation vaccines for coronaviruses, influenzaviruses, and other respiratory viruses
Despite the successful deployment of vaccines during the SARS-CoV2 pandemic, viruses replicating in the respiratory mucosal environment continue to present a particular challenge for developing effective vaccines with strong protection. Morens et al. discuss approaches that need to be...
www.cell.com
Gee, did you happen to notice the names of the authors on that paper? Of course you did. That's not the problem though. The problem is getting you to even look at anything that proves the deficiency in your non argument.
Do you like backing yourself into a corner until there's no more corners left for you to hide?