Geography Test

[SamBally]

The stalky bloke who harrases women online, including on his previous site, posts the same "obsession" meme over and over again.

You think no one else has noticed, don't you stalky?

 

[TwoWhalesInAPool]

 

[Moriarty]

You wouldn't understand irony if it bit you on the nose.

Lets leave that one for now and come back to it.

Thanks for proving my point 100% with your totally predictable rant, which I did predict, that men are superior to women.

No they are different, how can men be superior to women when it requires both to pro-create?
Men and women are different, thats all.

I have no need to "shame" you Moriarty or anyone else for that matter (what an odd thing to type online).

Not what I said, I specifally focused on studies about male to female long term relationships, where shame is a very good tool to manipulate.
It works for both sexes, it's simply women are better at it than men.
Just as men are better a physical manipulation, women excel at mental and emotional manipulation.

You shame yourself for constantly typing to a WOMAN who has made it clear she does not want to communicate with you.

I dont know if your a women, I never make the assumption as online people can be whatever they wish to be.
If you are indeed a women, what does it matter?
Are you implying that women deserve some special dispensation?
Sorry, we are all here by choice.

In my opinion Moriarty you are a word salad bullshitter, in a similar vein to the conversation yesterday, and you are one of only two men who do it on a consistent basis on the boards.

Word salad?
I think I speak plainly most of the time.

You specifically harass ME because I have explicitly told you to f/uck off and stop typing to me.

Not at all, I actually stopped replying to your posts for a while.
Do you still not get Im not attacking you personally, just your ideas?

Being a FAKE psychologist you have NO concept of what that actually means because you are incapable of processing or understanding that NO means NO.

A 10-year-old child would understand "f/uck off and stop typing to me".

But it is important to reiterate my point.

My point is that you are FAR creepier given your claim to be a master's educated scientist and a psychologist.

It should not be too difficult for such a supposedly well-educated man to understand.

Which you are clearly NOT.

You asked me to not post to you directly, I did that, then you invoked my name in your own posts.

Then you also claim, you lying old toad, that you have previously cited "documents studies or papers" which you quite simply have NOT, not a SINGLE time, in regards to this conversation.

I think you can find many posts of mine with documented evidentiary links when I have an opinion.

But thanks for finally clarifying (vaguely) what you mean, with your bullshit thesis regarding the American military entry test. Totally made up bullshit despite claiming you "have studied subjects for years". You have clearly NOT studied that particular topic.

Actually I have, the British army did a similar study, it was concerned with selectability.
Plus, there have been multiple studies on unemployment vrs unemployable.

100% I always knew what you were specifically referring to.

"Eugenics"

For people who might not know it is a hard-right ideology.

Think Adolph Hitler and Aryan supremacy.

Which I also addressed, that any ideology, whether on the left or the right is bad for any democracy.
I also warned that Autarchy, the Nazi ideology of self sufficiency is a bad idea in a recent post.
Can we not value people on thier charactor as MLK said.

Now other people may or may not understand that you are a bullshitter, they might be impressed by your word salad bullshit that you string together, often quite coherently, to present your usual RANT about men being superior to women, but I do recognise it is BULLSHIT and I AM qualified to comment.

Men are not superior to women apart from on the extremes of strength and arguably IQ.
If you believe the Bell Curve theory, at the top and bottom ends of IQ you will find men, women tend to be more centralised in the curve.
Just as men are at the violent ends of a bell curve.
However, that is just a theory, until it's proven we dont know.

You are a hard right conspiracy theorist, of if you like a racist scumbag, who believes men are superior to women and that the white race is superior.

Not at all, men and women are different, black and white, the same.
Phrenology is different, but we are all simply homo sapians.
Phenotypes dont equate to superiority.
Can we not simply judge each other based on the strength of our charactor, not the colour of our skin?

You believe everyone with an IQ lower than you one you arbitrarily reached is a "burden on society". YOU stated that in black and white and as most fails in the American military entry test are BLACK recruits I understood EXACTLY why you bullshitted with a made-up concept in regards to the American military.

I never racialised it, that is a supposition you make.

As I stated there is NOT an IQ test specifically for entry to the American military, it does NOT exist, that YOU specifically present as the foundation for your SH/IT views.

No, there is a general cognative ability test.
Which equates to an IQ test 1:1

Notice as well, he does NOT even understand what he types. For example, IQ, in the context how he applied it, does NOT measure someone's "net worth" to society.

IQ is simply a measure of intellectual ability given a test.
As I have stated many times before, some of the smartest people I know are dumb as a box of rocks on an IQ test.
Yet most of the university educated people I know could rate highly on an IQ test, but actually know feck all.

If "net worth" was the foundation then MOST people would fail his made-up test because MOST people do not meet that silly criterion.

"Net Worth" is simply what one can do for society, it does not mean one has to be a rocket scientist or a brain surgeon.
It means what you give to the social fabric of life.
One can be an artist who has no monetary value, yet still produce beautiful works of art.

The creepiest thing of all though is how a man describes the disabled as "a burden on society".

A much more stupid version of Adolph Hitler.

As such, Godwins Law applies.

"A statement maintaining that if any online discussion continues long enough, someone will almost certainly compare someone else to Hitler"

Which you have done.

So, for the hypocracy point..

Lets get back to Irony which you mentioned.
The Irony is, that a lot of the time I actually agree with you, but when I dont you seem to make it personal.
Yet all the while you accuse people of attacking you, which I am not.
I simply want to understand your logic.
Which baffles me I admit, but also makes me wonder.

So, if you dont want to talk to me, theres always a block button you know.
Save us all some time that way if your just a troll.

 

[SamBally]

I don't take anything you type personally Moriarty, or anyone else for that matter.

You appear to spend a lot of time on this site crudely attempting to justify your inappropriate behavior.

I just do NOT want to engage with a creepy old man like you.

I couldn't be bothered reading all of your disjoined gibberish but I think that I got the gist of some of it.

Why should I block you to stop reading your CREEPY lines to me, you CREEPY old man, when I have warned you explicitly to stop typing to me on NUMEROUS occasions?

Moriarty, you are shot away, darling.

Barking.

Thanks for that word salad mumbo jumbo btw. This is to be expected from a FAKE psychologist, a FAKE scientist, and whatever other pissed bullshit you type in a gropy attempt to explain away your scarily weird behavior.

BTW, Your NUMEROUS unwanted posts to me are you are on your message history, you drunken slob.

Please, don't get "back to me" with yet more word salad bullshit because you are so DESPERATE to type complete bollocks.

You simply do NOT understand, you CREEPY old man, that NO means NO.

I do NOT want to communicate with a creepy old man like you.

 

[SamBally]

BTW, does this useless prick ever quote anything else other than "Godwin's Law" or his year 10 philosophy?

 

[SamBally]

Oh and let me just explain one other thing if I may.

What bullshitters like Moriarty do is type an ambiguous statement.

Because they lack knowledge in that particular topic.

Do not feed these vultures by giving them the opportunity to glean any more information from your response.

Creepy old men like this, alter what they have previously typed based on that response and via google.

A google expert.

Do not ENGAGE in google debates with creepy old men online.

 

[SamBally]

Lol. SammyBoy claims to “I just do NOT want to engage with a creepy old man like you.” then, in the same comment goes on to a lengthy diatribe against the same chatter.
I think SammyBoy might actually have masochistic tendencies, he does appear to only want folk to dislike him and his comments.

Here is the other creepy old man, lurking at 2 am, as I described much earlier. Forcing himself on women who despise him.

 

[SamBally]

Read my thesis from earlier.

The proof is in the pudding.

Both incredibly creepy old men and the pair of them, Christopher being the much more stupid version, creep around this site harassing lone women.

 

[SamBally]

You enjoy creeping around all morning Christopher, lurking silently in the background, until someone else types.

You sad sad sad bastard.

 

[SamBally]

Observe the manner in which these creepy old men type.

The infantile lines.

This is what happens when it becomes a lifestyle choice.

It becomes the be-all and the end-all.

They simply lack the cognitive function to process their own behavior.

 

[SamBally]

Btw, Christopher, enjoy yet another long lonely morning lurking waiting for your next victim to troll.

To pass the LONG lonely hours and so you think you are not alone.

A lifestyle choice.

Farewell.

 

[Moriarty]

Btw, Christopher, enjoy yet another long lonely morning lurking waiting for your next victim to troll.

To pass the LONG lonely hours and so you think you are not alone.

A lifestyle choice.

Farewell.

I don't take anything you type personally Moriarty, or anyone else for that matter.

You appear to spend a lot of time on this site crudely attempting to justify your inappropriate behavior.

I just do NOT want to engage with a creepy old man like you.

I couldn't be bothered reading all of your disjoined gibberish but I think that I got the gist of some of it.

Why should I block you to stop reading your CREEPY lines to me, you CREEPY old man, when I have warned you explicitly to stop typing to me on NUMEROUS occasions?

Moriarty, you are shot away, darling.

Barking.

Thanks for that word salad mumbo jumbo btw. This is to be expected from a FAKE psychologist, a FAKE scientist, and whatever other pissed bullshit you type in a gropy attempt to explain away your scarily weird behavior.

BTW, Your NUMEROUS unwanted posts to me are you are on your message history, you drunken slob.

Please, don't get "back to me" with yet more word salad bullshit because you are so DESPERATE to type complete bollocks.

You simply do NOT understand, you CREEPY old man, that NO means NO.

I do NOT want to communicate with a creepy old man like you.

I feel sad that you didnt actually answer anything.
You had nothing but "Your a creepy old man".

I would be open to discussing anything with anyone.
However, you wish to continue to play a self indulgant victim card, so be it.

Then it is wrong of me to let you continue to self depricate so much.
One must face thier own fears and opinions.
So I will try and help by posting something on any of your opinions to either support it, or refute it.
You obviosly need some help, to come to some sort of self realisation.
I would be happy to help with that

Now you could always block me if you wish.
Tis a simple function, but I hope you dont.

I mean you havent yet, so ...

 

[SamBally]

No means NO!

Says the fraud, the charlatan, who just does not recognise that EVERYONE single person on these boards, with any grey matter at all, avoids participating in ANY in-depth conversation with him simply because he manipulates EVERY single thread he can into yet another passive-aggressive rant about how tough men have it. Typing pretentious word salad bullshit along the way that is NOT relevant.

Typing yet another 10,000-word essay of inane word salad gibberish to explain REALLY really slowly.

The other day, this egotistical clown even had the audacity to type that the issues in Afghanistan could be resolved if only the Taliban communicated and if only they could come round to his way of thinking and his liberal hard-right ideology.

Oooo I say, why on earth didn't EXPERTS in diplomacy, the best of the best, think of that one?

Exactly the same PATTERN while he pretends to debate on these boards. The clown keeps typing about "communication" and "learning from each other". This means patronising women, patting us on the head, and telling us why he is RIGHT and we are wrong. If only we could get round to his way of thinking the world would be a much nicer place.

A mansplaining patronising old creep who truly does believe that he is a "social scientist" and although he knows NOTHING in-depth about 'social science'.

Barking fucking mad.