He was proven right many times, as has quantum mechanics, sadly until the link (it will be found I’m sure) between Einstein’s findings (only deals with the relatively large) and quantum mechanics (the very VERY small) is discovered we will never truly understand the universe.
Lol. But even quantum mechanics rules out the possibility of infinity gravity, more so than Einstein ever did. Yes entanglement is intriguing, but it has led to quantum computers already, the possibilities are mind boggling.
But he couldn’t explain it. Neither could Planck. They knew of it, little more.
You are shifting your position. Einstein won a nobel prize for it, proving the quantum nature of light ! Nobody understand it. Beyond our capability as Fenyman pointed out. But we do know its affects....
But he knew very little. Could prove even less. Just unproven theories in the main. Only since the 80s have we even begun to decipher quantum mechanics.
All we know now was established in the twenties. John Bell in the 60 ties proposed an experinment to prove entanglement, only a few years later this was don, in the sevrnties. So spooky action at a distance does exist just as Bohr proposed in the twenties. Einstein in effect was wrong about entanglement, as influences were apparently instantaneous thus breaching the speed of light in a vacumn.
The theory was established, yes, proven no. Bohr was far ahead I agree, more so than Einstein, but even he could not prove it beyond doubt. I don’t claim to be a physicist, it’s just a hobby, nor do I claim to understand it, just as even now, most dont. Quantum mechanics is in its early stages, the only benefit so far, as I understand it, is the q computer. I’m sure there’s more we don’t know about but in time we will.
Fun times ahead that’s for sure. In your time maybe
No doubt. Among others. They won’t be behind the 8 ball that’s for sure. My money is on China tho.
As you say, money is at the root of everything. Be it the lack of cash, the abuse of wealth, or the desire to control financial affairs.The only limit to what we can percieve, be that large or small, from the infinity of the universe to the unimaginable of the quantum is only limited by our subjective percieved knowledge of our surroundings.
Medicine was once viewed as the 4 elements within us being out of balance.
Who is to say what is real or percieved, imagined or fact.
Todays facts were yesterdays theories, tomorrows facts are todays theories.
The idea that conspiracy comes into it is purely faith based, faith in religion, ideology or science itself.
One labels something a conspiracy theory with great risk, as has been shown time and again, sometimes facts are kept hidden by conspiracy.
Religion being the largest culprit in history, today however, I think political money is the main driver behind it.
When special interest groups or governments move into funding of research, it becomes political hence ideological.
If those finding do not show what those groups want it to, do you think they publish it?
Hence a conspiracy of silence.
When papers can be peer reviewed showing dog owners are sexist based on purely made up evidence, when we study that Glacial science is sexist, are we really furthering human knowledge?
When we have teachers calling for the "de-colonisation" of mathematics due to it being a product of a Western patriarchy, even though the basis of which was formed in Arabia.
Can we really perieve reality as anything other than fecked at this moment in time