‘We’re sending largely empty planes to Rwanda to prove a point’ says the government.

SamBally

Dance with me until the sun rises!
Joined
Apr 13, 2021
Messages
2,022
Reaction score
1,930
The government have revealed today that they are sending a near empty plane to Rwanda this evening out of principle and in order to prove a point, that they are heartless, utterly stupid and don’t give a sh** about the environment.

With only seven, or maybe eight migrants now expected to actually be on the flight this evening, foreign secretary Liz Truss has moved to defend the government’s position by insisting that they still need to send the flight to Rwanda to prove a ridiculous point.

Speaking earlier she told us, “Yes, we know the flight will be essentially empty, but that’s not going to stop us.

“We are still going to send an empty flight to Rwanda in order to prove three points to the world.

“One, we are heartless bastards who don’t give a sh** about the plight of desperate migrants trying to flee war and persecution from their own country.

“Two, we are totally fucking stupid and will to spend £250k of YOUR money for each flight, even when there are basically no migrants actually on the actual plane.

“And finally, that we do not give a sh** about the climate change or the environment, sending empty planes half way round the world and burning through fifty tonnes of fossil fuel completely unnecessarily just because we are stubborn as ****.”

Asked if they could perhaps look to help and assist the migrants here and think of a more workable solution we were told, “Yes, but what point would that prove?”
 

TwoWhalesInAPool

UKChat Celebrity
Joined
Aug 12, 2018
Messages
3,682
Reaction score
2,246
The government have revealed today that they are sending a near empty plane to Rwanda this evening out of principle and in order to prove a point, that they are heartless, utterly stupid and don’t give a sh** about the environment.

With only seven, or maybe eight migrants now expected to actually be on the flight this evening, foreign secretary Liz Truss has moved to defend the government’s position by insisting that they still need to send the flight to Rwanda to prove a ridiculous point.

Speaking earlier she told us, “Yes, we know the flight will be essentially empty, but that’s not going to stop us.

“We are still going to send an empty flight to Rwanda in order to prove three points to the world.

“One, we are heartless bastards who don’t give a sh** about the plight of desperate migrants trying to flee war and persecution from their own country.

“Two, we are totally fucking stupid and will to spend £250k of YOUR money for each flight, even when there are basically no migrants actually on the actual plane.

“And finally, that we do not give a sh** about the climate change or the environment, sending empty planes half way round the world and burning through fifty tonnes of fossil fuel completely unnecessarily just because we are stubborn as ****.”

Asked if they could perhaps look to help and assist the migrants here and think of a more workable solution we were told, “Yes, but what point would that prove?”
002i.jpg
 

ladymuck

UKChat Expert
Joined
Jul 3, 2019
Messages
129
Reaction score
107
They are just trying to kid us into thinking they are tackling the problem. Thousands of illegals have entered the country but they could only find 130 to deport? The truth is that all in Parliament actually want all these people here....they have been actively encouraging them right from the beginning. They are so determined to destroy white Britain, anyone with a dark skin is welcome.
 

SamBally

Dance with me until the sun rises!
Joined
Apr 13, 2021
Messages
2,022
Reaction score
1,930
A humble message for the Prime Minister if you happen to be reading this, Boris. I just had a little brainwave/thought, as you do, so thank me later.

Please STOP frittering away £250,000 of taxpayers' cash on EACH and EVERY single economic migrant/refugee your government detains and then forcefully sends to Rwanda for 'processing'. That figure is not even including the £120 million initially handed over to Rwanda and which will potentially rise to billions.

And of course, that initial 'detention' does NOT determine whether those people will be permanently removed from the UK anyway.

Instead, use OUR money to invest in HOUSING. It is NOT your personal piggybank, Boris, it is OUR money.

Housing Boris.

Are you with me so far, Boris?

For example, if your government pissed billions up against the wall during the pandemic, then a mere £1 million will build a row of around 8 well-built GREEN two-bedroom terraced houses on pre-existing state-owned brownfield sites or state-owned sites no longer in use and with the infrastructure already in place. Add x amount to improve the local infrastructure.

The equivalent of the cost that WE already pay to remove a mere 8 immigrants/refugees.

8 people!

Now repeat this nationally and on a HUGE scale such as after world war ll.

For every 10 houses designate 5 for sale on the open market and the other 5 as social housing with affordable rent.

The combined profit and rent combined MORE than pay for the initial investment.

The PROFIT should be strictly reinvested in maintaining the social housing and building more housing.

Win Win Win.

What do you think, Boris?
 
Back
Top