Gammon gaydar so outdated it cannot detect post-2000 homosexuals.

[Kev45]

Gammon Norman Steele, aged 57, was easily able to identify gay men and women of the 20th century, but admits for the last 22 years it has gone a bit haywire.

He said: Back when I was young it was Larry Grayson, Marc Almond, Julian Clary and Bronski Beat. You knew where you were in those days.

But now? They don’t even look gay any more. The women don’t always have short hair and the man don’t carry handbags. Nobody calls each other ‘ducky’ and I’m told they can get through whole conversations without an outrageous double entendre.

My son said watching Eurovision, visiting antiques fairs with a male friend or owning small dogs are all signs of gayness, but I do those. Antiques fairs are brilliant for military memorabilia.

“My gaydar’s on the blink. Homosexuals could be in the same room as me and I wouldn’t know it. The only criteria I’ve got left is ‘have previously or are currently hosting Bake-Off stroke QI’.

Steele added: “Apparently they’re bringing back these wild, over-the-top gay people in rubber shorts riding giant pink inflatables in parades. That’s very helpful and if I see one I’ll say so.”

 

[Raining_Roses]

Gammon Norman Steele, aged 57, was easily able to identify gay men and women of the 20th century, but admits for the last 22 years it has gone a bit haywire.

He said: Back when I was young it was Larry Grayson, Marc Almond, Julian Clary and Bronski Beat. You knew where you were in those days.

But now? They don’t even look gay any more. The women don’t always have short hair and the man don’t carry handbags. Nobody calls each other ‘ducky’ and I’m told they can get through whole conversations without an outrageous double entendre.

My son said watching Eurovision, visiting antiques fairs with a male friend or owning small dogs are all signs of gayness, but I do those. Antiques fairs are brilliant for military memorabilia.

“My gaydar’s on the blink. Homosexuals could be in the same room as me and I wouldn’t know it. The only criteria I’ve got left is ‘have previously or are currently hosting Bake-Off stroke QI’.

Steele added: “Apparently they’re bringing back these wild, over-the-top gay people in rubber shorts riding giant pink inflatables in parades. That’s very helpful and if I see one I’ll say so.”

Just to point something out here, Norman would have been born in 1967 and would have been 3 years old when the gay pride movement started. He would have been 10 yrs old when the Village People were hitting Top of the Pops and a teenager when Kenny Everett was doing "everything in the best possible taste!". He might have even experimented with eyeliner & long hair- after all, he probably grew up listening to David Bowie on the radio and singing Lola by The Kinks, and as a teen, listened to Boy George. Norman would have been of the age to grow-up watching the disintegration of stereotypes. Hopefully, anyway.

Hey, I could be wrong, but few people of that generation (or mine, for that matter) give a shite what sexuality someone is and I would hope that no one cares about mine. Sleep with who you want, be attracted to who you want- be you, be happy. Life's too short to be hung up on who's doing what with who.
But....stop shoving it in our faces. And as a the B part of the LGB community, with lots of L friends and colleagues, we are a little bit fed up of the fetishists attempting to make their paraphilias a 'sexuality' and enforcing these concepts on young minds.
Keep your damn rubber shorts and inflatables, but keep them to the bedroom/living room/club and not parade them at family events. No one gives a shite about your junk or what you do with it.

 

[Kev45]

we are a little bit fed up of the fetishists attempting to make their paraphilias a 'sexuality' and enforcing these concepts on young minds.

I have no idea what you are referring to here, who is this "we" you refer to?

You mean the sexually conservative turn the lights out right now soldier type of person, right?

I don't particularly enjoy bumping into 8 giant pink penises wobbling around Blackpool in the early evening (or afternoon) at the weekend, but as the go-to place for hen events in the North West. I acknowledge if I choose to go there at the weekend, at some point I possibly might come across a petite lady, pissed as a newt, shoved inside an inflatable 6-foot pink penis with an L plate gaffer taped on her back.

You also completely lost me on the "fetishist" because I genuinely have NO idea what you are talking about.

Are you arguing people with foot fetishes have infiltrated the entire LGBT movement and are demanding equal rights for toes?

Toes have rights too, right?

Lifes too short to be hung up on who's doing what with who.

So why are you so hung about what "fetishists" get up to in the privacy of their own bedrooms or the costumes they publicly display at festivals celebrating their sexuality. I say costumes because how on earth do you identify a fetishist anyway, or is there possibly another method that I have missed here?

Alluding, with no evidence at all, that it is an ideology that is "enforcing" these concepts on young minds.

I have been around the block once or twice and have NEVER, not a single time, encountered this plague of fetishism currently corrupting innocent lives.

Do you have any idea what "young people" can access online nowadays, because I can assure you, a man wearing latex and wriggling his toes in ecstasy, is reasonably tame?

Ban the internet, right?

Just to point something out here, Norman would have been born in 1967

Yes, and only in 1967 were homosexual acts legalised and no longer a criminal offence in the UK. I doubt very much people up and down the UK suddenly welcomed homosexuality into their lives and homes. Well there is no doubt at all, they simply didn't (and still don't), and which of course was what the parody post was taking the piss out of in the first place.

 

[TwoWhalesInAPool]

I have no idea what you are referring to here, who is this "we" you refer to?

You mean the sexually conservative turn the lights out right now soldier type of person, right?

I don't particularly enjoy bumping into 8 giant pink penises wobbling around Blackpool in the early evening (or afternoon) at the weekend, but as the go-to place for hen events in the North West. I acknowledge if I choose to go there at the weekend, at some point I possibly might come across a petite lady, pissed as a newt, shoved inside an inflatable 6-foot pink penis with an L plate gaffer taped on her back.

You also completely lost me on the "fetishist" because I genuinely have NO idea what you are talking about.

Are you arguing people with foot fetishes have infiltrated the entire LGBT movement and are demanding equal rights for toes?

Toes have rights too, right?

@Kev45 thanks for mentioning/asking and bringing up, everything I wanted to say! I too, have no f.ucking idea what is being referred here. Possibly, BDSM and LGBTQ are being 'confused'?

So why are you so hung about what "fetishists" get up to in the privacy of their own bedrooms or the costumes they publicly display at festivals celebrating their sexuality. I say costumes because how on earth do you identify a fetishist anyway, or is there possibly another method that I have missed here?

Alluding, with no evidence at all, that it is an ideology that is "enforcing" these concepts on young minds.

I have been around the block once or twice and have NEVER, not a single time, encountered this plague of fetishism currently corrupting innocent lives.

Do you have any idea what "young people" can access online nowadays, because I can assure you, a man wearing latex and wriggling his toes in ecstasy, is reasonably tame?

Ban the internet, right?

Yes, and only in 1967 were homosexual acts legalised and no longer a criminal offence in the UK. I doubt very much people up and down the UK suddenly welcomed homosexuality into their lives and homes. Well there is no doubt at all, they simply didn't (and still don't), and which of course was what the parody post was taking the piss out of in the first place.

LOL - it amazes me how many take these satirical/parody posts seriously. It was the same back in the 'bad' old days!

And we all know how well that ended.

 

[Kev45]

Lol, they do kinda parody the actual parody and not even intentionally.


" I am a tolerant person..." followed by a long, random list of what they are not tolerant about.

 

[Kev45]

Possibly, BDSM and LGBTQ are being 'confused'?

Exactly and still got it wrong. Unless the perfectly normal toe licking, suddenly became an evil ideology... right?

 

[Lil_White_Fox]

Just to point something out here, Norman would have been born in 1967 and would have been 3 years old when the gay pride movement started. He would have been 10 yrs old when the Village People were hitting Top of the Pops and a teenager when Kenny Everett was doing "everything in the best possible taste!". He might have even experimented with eyeliner & long hair- after all, he probably grew up listening to David Bowie on the radio and singing Lola by The Kinks, and as a teen, listened to Boy George. Norman would have been of the age to grow-up watching the disintegration of stereotypes.

Just to point something out here, Norman would have been born in 1967 and would have been 3 years old when the gay pride movement started. He would have been 10 yrs old when the Village People were hitting Top of the Pops and a teenager when Kenny Everett was doing "everything in the best possible taste!". He might have even experimented with eyeliner & long hair- after all, he probably grew up listening to David Bowie on the radio and singing Lola by The Kinks, and as a teen, listened to Boy George. Norman would have been of the age to grow-up watching the disintegration of stereotypes. Hopefully, anyway.

Hey, I could be wrong, but few people of that generation (or mine, for that matter) give a shite what sexuality someone is and I would hope that no one cares about mine. Sleep with who you want, be attracted to who you want- be you, be happy. Life's too short to be hung up on who's doing what with who.
But....stop shoving it in our faces. And as a the B part of the LGB community, with lots of L friends and colleagues, we are a little bit fed up of the fetishists attempting to make their paraphilias a 'sexuality' and enforcing these concepts on young minds.
Keep your damn rubber shorts and inflatables, but keep them to the bedroom/living room/club and not parade them at family events. No one gives a shite about your junk or what you do with it.

I think you missed this #naileditinone

 

[Kev45]

It was the same back in the 'bad' old days!

Oh, I joined the dots, "fetishist" wasn't actually another 'bad' (clumsy) mistake as I originally assumed.

A carefully written, really rather sinister post, but exactly the same age-old homophobic trope that just cost the grifter Laurence Fox a very public £2.5 million.

Sly as sly can be.

 

[Moriarty]

Always amazes me that people who talk about the BDSM scene have no fecking idea what actually goes on.

The BDSM scene is about people living out fantasies in a controlled, private enviroment.

It has very little about slavery and dominating someone in a permanently controlling way.

People tend to be eclectic in what they want, think they want and don't know what they want sexually.

I know of many people who have been part of a BDSM fantasy, played a part in several over the years.

Some of them would appear wrong by todays standard, I have seen a women gang ***** by 8 guys, then sat down afterwards and thanked them and paid for it.
Known a straight guy with a family get his **** cherry popped by a BBC and he loved it.
Seen a man who wanted to be cucked and a women who wanted it to.

There is no end of so called deprivation within the human mind.
Those are what is called fetishes.

At all times, in all scenarios, there are safety limits, safe words and tap out clauses which are discussed before the event takes place.
Most people who sign up for some form of fetish experience, spend more time talking to the outsiders involved about what they want, what is allowed and what is not than the actual act.

BDSM just gets a bad rap because it's not "Normal".
Pfft, what is these days?

 

[Amy42Kent]

Always amazes me that people who talk about the BDSM scene have no fecking idea what actually goes on.

The BDSM scene is about people living out fantasies in a controlled, private enviroment.

Totally so. People on the BDSM/fetish scene tend to be a lot more clued up on consent, for one thing. Um... apparently.

 

[Raining_Roses]

I have no idea what you are referring to here, who is this "we" you refer to?

Aha! Now we’re getting to a point! Despite the fluffy bakes and cups and tea, I knew we’d come back to throwing knives again! Thank you for the consistency.
We, the gender critical, to answer your question directly. The clue was in the original post (‘lots of L friends and colleagues’) or did you intentionally overlook that bit? Typical male attitude there- overlooking what women say! You can slap on all the lipstick you want, but you can’t escape innate male behaviour.

You mean the sexually conservative turn the lights out right now soldier type of person, right?

Why do you assume that anyone who believes in biology and decency is vanilla? This clearly demonstrates how YOU box others in and then hypocritically scream about how others judge.

I don't particularly enjoy bumping into 8 giant pink penises wobbling around Blackpool in the early evening (or afternoon) at the weekend, but as the go-to place for hen events in the North West. I acknowledge if I choose to go there at the weekend, at some point I possibly might come across a petite lady, pissed as a newt, shoved inside an inflatable 6-foot pink penis with an L plate gaffer taped on her back.

The above demonstrates an attempt at gaslighting on a forum board. A very poor attempt at gaslighting, but alas, a familiar strategy from the fetish-promoting, Marxists. Now let’s go back to your original post to evidence this gaslighting. Your original post has no connection whatsoever to the above paragraph and it’s clear you’ve tried to turn your sh!t around. Sad, very sad. If you have a conviction, at least stand by it.

You also completely lost me on the "fetishist" because I genuinely have NO idea what you are talking about.

Are you arguing people with foot fetishes have infiltrated the entire LGBT movement and are demanding equal rights for toes?

Toes have rights too, right?

Time is precious, so I’ll refrain from trying to comment on the above, because you’ve lost me. It makes no sense whatsoever. You know damn well what I was arguing about.

So why are you so hung about what "fetishists" get up to in the privacy of their own bedrooms or the costumes they publicly display at festivals celebrating their sexuality. I say costumes because how on earth do you identify a fetishist anyway, or is there possibly another method that I have missed here?

Again, you’ve failed to make any sense in the first part of your sentence, because I clearly said ‘Keep your damn rubber shorts and inflatables, but keep them to the bedroom/living room/club’. The question here should be why do people find it necessary to wear the ‘celebration of their sexuality’ at festivals? Who cares what you do in your sexual life? Why is it so important that other people need to know about it? What makes you so insecure about that tiny part of your life and identity that you need to shout about it to the world?

How to identify a fetishist? I can think of a couple. Someone who can’t keep their sex life to themselves- someone who feels the need to exhibit their sexual preferences and parade them around with the egotistic belief that it makes them special and everyone needs to f*cking know about it. Someone who thinks the rules for everyone should bend so they can accommodate their sexual kicks full time and in spaces that they should stay the f*ck out of. Sound familiar?

Alluding, with no evidence at all, that it is an ideology that is "enforcing" these concepts on young minds.

I have been around the block once or twice and have NEVER, not a single time, encountered this plague of fetishism currently corrupting innocent lives.

Here we go! The ‘you have no evidence’ bullsh!t, which is completely and utterly wrong to laughable proportions. We have schools, the NHS and child abusing charities actively promoting and encouraging the sterilisation of children. We have scandals from the Tavistock clinic and Mermaids; we’ve got schools handing out and teaching propaganda, doctors fast-tracking children from care and abused backgrounds, who clearly have emotional issues and you’re saying there’s no evidence? What kind of tiny little bubble do you live in? We are living in a time of conversion therapy of a different name and you want to spin the ‘there’s no proof’? F*ck me! The gaslighting is really strong with your ilk, isn’t it?

Do you have any idea what "young people" can access online nowadays, because I can assure you, a man wearing latex and wriggling his toes in ecstasy, is reasonably tame?

Ban the internet, right?

Yes. Ban the internet for children of under a certain age and stop them falling under the influence of these ‘men wearing latex’. That would be a good idea.

Yes, and only in 1967 were homosexual acts legalised and no longer a criminal offence in the UK. I doubt very much people up and down the UK suddenly welcomed homosexuality into their lives and homes. Well there is no doubt at all, they simply didn't (and still don't), and which of course was what the parody post was taking the piss out of in the first place.

But being born in 1967, he wouldn’t have had any idea what a homosexual was for a good few years yet and would never have lived in a time when it was illegal to be gay, so he wouldn’t have known anything else. He’d have been on the cusp of the change of attitudes and would have grown up with more acceptance than his parents.

As your last sentence explains, b0llocks all to do with Hen nights in Blackpool! And confusingly, you’ve alluded in posts that you’re of that generation, so how can you speak for all of them?

 

[Raining_Roses]

Oh, I joined the dots, "fetishist" wasn't actually another 'bad' (clumsy) mistake as I originally assumed.

A carefully written, really rather sinister post, but exactly the same age-old homophobic trope that just cost the grifter Laurence Fox a very public £2.5 million.

Sly as sly can be.

Ooh, this will be a good one! Please explain how and where I've been homophobic.

I'm guessing the next slur will be 'bigot' or 'TERF'.

You lot are so boringly predictable and your delusions make you really think the name calling has any effect! (yawn)

 

[Kev45]

We, the gender critical, to answer your question directly.

You mean you personally, don't you, because "you" don't speak for all "women". Anecdotal evidence (which is all you have) means diddly squat.

You can slap on all the lipstick you want, but you can’t escape innate male behaviour.

How would you know? Because as it happens I believe that you are extremely aggressive by nature, and extremely masculine, and it would not surprise me in the least if you are male.

These sorts of accusations don't go anywhere, right?

Typical male attitude there- overlooking what women say!

What you say, I don't like your views, 99% of your views, not the views of all women in general.

Why do you assume that anyone who believes in biology and decency is vanilla?

That doesn't make any sense whatsoever, you spoke about "costumes" at festivals.

Who are you to decide what is decent or not.

Moving the goalposts to suit your new argument, right?

This clearly demonstrates how YOU box others in and then hypocritically scream about how others

I am not screaming, I am already aware you are far-right, with intolerant views, you box yourself in by the comments you post.

boxing in "biology and decency".

Says the person boxing in transgenderism/ homosexuality in to fit in your narrow view of the world.

How would you know what is decent or not?

Here we go! The ‘you have no evidence’ bullsh!t

You don't have any evidence, do you, and don't understand how science works?

Your opinion on this subject, or my opinion, means sweet FA, but particularly when you make such ridiculously exaggerated accusations.

Hence, the furious response by you, right?

child abusing charities

In your opinion. You have no evidence charities abuse children. But I bet you know someone who knows, right (lol)?

Abuse is a criminal offence, why haven't you reported your allegations to the relevant authorities?

How to identify a fetishist? I can think of a couple. Someone who can’t keep their sex life to themselves- someone who feels the need to exhibit their sexual preferences and parade them around with the egotistic belief that it makes them special and everyone needs to f*cking know about it.

Of course, you do, of course you know a couple, curtsey of more anecdotes right, the female version of the nutty professor.

"Fetishist" could mean anything at all and applies across the board, including all sexualities, and gender.

Whereas, you only apply it in a negative context.

Yes. Ban the internet for children of under a certain age and stop them falling under the influence of these ‘men wearing latex’. That would be a good idea.

I'd much prefer if we banned angry people like you, who take a few extreme examples and apply it across the board. Did you have a bad experience with latex, always use a nice talcum powder if the outfit is really tight.

Someone who can’t keep their sex life to themselves- someone who feels the need to exhibit their sexual preferences and parade them around with the egotistic belief that it makes them special and everyone needs to f*cking know about it.

You brought up festivals, no one else and nothing else.

So stop going to Gay Pride events.

Like a grown-up, with choices whether to go or not.

The gaslighting is really strong with your ilk, isn’t it?

Says the transphobic/homophobe who is now denying they are a transphobic/homophobe after typing two transphobic/homophobic posts, and simply because they got challenged about their transphobia/homophobia.

You don't like your prehistoric views being publicly challenged, do you?

What kind of tiny little bubble do you live in

A bigger bubble than the prism you inhabit, I am reasonably tolerant, you are not.

But being born in 1967, he wouldn’t have had any idea what a homosexual was for a good few years yet and would never have lived in a time when it was illegal to be gay, so he wouldn’t have known anything else. He’d have been on the cusp of the change of attitudes and would have grown up with more acceptance than his parents.

What a load of right-wing cobblers, I could post link after link after link, demonstrating a HUGE increase in violence and abuse towards both groups and never mind the 70s and 80s, 90s, here and now in 2024.

People like you fuel it.

As your last sentence explains, b0llocks all to do with Hen nights in Blackpool! And confusingly, you’ve alluded in posts that you’re of that generation, so how can you speak for all of them?

Your post mentioned provocative costumes and sweet FA else. I replied that I find other costumes irritating, and in context to what you typed. If you don't like the costumes worn at these festivals, as I said, stop going just to find a reason to be angry about it.

You lot are so boringly predictable and your delusions make you really think the name calling has any effect! (yawn)

You have just littered your post with personal attacks, stop whining, like a child, when you get a small dose back.

Ooh, this will be a good one! Please explain how and where I've been homophobic.

Read the two posts you made.

100% transphobic and homophobic in my opinion.

 

[Raining_Roses]

You mean you personally, don't you, because "you" don't speak for all "women". Anecdotal evidence (which is all you have) means diddly squat.



How would you know? Because as it happens I believe that you are extremely aggressive by nature, and extremely masculine, and it would not surprise me in the least if you are male.

These sorts of accusations don't go anywhere, right?



What you say, I don't like your views, 99% of your views, not the views of all women in general.



That doesn't make any sense whatsoever, you spoke about "costumes" at festivals.

Who are you to decide what is decent or not.

Moving the goalposts to suit your new argument, right?



I am not screaming, I am already aware you are far-right, with intolerant views, you box yourself in by the comments you post.



Says the person boxing in transgenderism/ homosexuality in to fit in your narrow view of the world.

How would you know what is decent or not?




You don't have any evidence, do you, and don't understand how science works?

Your opinion on this subject, or my opinion, means sweet FA, but particularly when you make such ridiculously exaggerated accusations.

Hence, the furious response by you, right?



In your opinion. You have no evidence charities abuse children. But I bet you know someone who knows, right (lol)?

Abuse is a criminal offence, why haven't you reported your allegations to the relevant authorities?



Of course, you do, of course you know a couple, curtsey of more anecdotes right, the female version of the nutty professor.

"Fetishist" could mean anything at all and applies across the board, including all sexualities, and gender.

Whereas, you only apply it in a negative context.



I'd much prefer if we banned angry people like you, who take a few extreme examples and apply it across the board. Did you have a bad experience with latex, always use a nice talcum powder if the outfit is really tight.



You brought up festivals, no one else and nothing else.

So stop going to Gay Pride events.

Like a grown-up, with choices whether to go or not.



Says the transphobic/homophobe who is now denying they are a transphobic/homophobe after typing two transphobic/homophobic posts, and simply because they got challenged about their transphobia/homophobia.

You don't like your prehistoric views being publicly challenged, do you?



A bigger bubble than the prism you inhabit, I am reasonably tolerant, you are not.




What a load of right-wing cobblers, I could post link after link after link, demonstrating a HUGE increase in violence and abuse towards both groups and never mind the 70s and 80s, 90s, here and now in 2024.

People like you fuel it.



Your post mentioned provocative costumes and sweet FA else. I replied that I find other costumes irritating, and in context to what you typed. If you don't like the costumes worn at these festivals, as I said, stop going just to find a reason to be angry about it.



You have just littered your post with personal attacks, stop whining, like a child, when you get a small dose back.



Read the two posts you made.

100% transphobic and homophobic in my opinion.

While I could waste my Sunday arguing semantics with a nobody on a Chat forum, I don't want to waste this gorgeous day. You seem to have the luxury of time-wasting, so crack on, sweetheart. You get your latex in a twist over me calling you sweetheart and the apparent homophobic/transphobic/everyone's right wing because they won't let us shove our girl-willies in everyone's faces and I'll leave it here.

 

[Kev45]

While I could waste my Sunday arguing semantics with a nobody on a Chat forum, I don't want to waste this gorgeous day. You seem to have the luxury of time-wasting, so crack on, sweetheart. You get your latex in a twist over me calling you sweetheart and the apparent homophobic/transphobic/everyone's right wing because they won't let us shove our girl-willies in everyone's faces and I'll leave it here.

View attachment 14702

Sexualized imagery involving children in that context are banned on this site.

I won't report you.

I don't have to.

Because I know there are no depths you won't stoop to.

I already know what you, and those just like you, are capable of.

Enjoy your day hunting imaginary cartoon men in pink thongs.

 

[Raining_Roses]

Sexualized imagery involving children in that context are banned on this site.

I won't report you.

I don't have to.

Because I know there are no depths you won't stoop to.

I already know what you, and those just like you, are capable of.

Enjoy your day hunting imaginary cartoon men in pink thongs.

Oh, the hyperbole! 'Sexualised imagery involving children', my ass!
I see you have no problem with it in libraries with an audience of under 5's, but a cartoon parodying the hyperbolic, attention-seeking attitude of AGPs (who largely happen to be white males of a certain age) on a public forum with an audience of adults is offensive to you?

I certainty know what you, and those like you, are capable of.

 

[Kev45]

Oh, the hyperbole! 'Sexualised imagery involving children', my ass!

What a disturbed individual you are, especially taking into account your previous three posts.

Posting a "cartoon" of a man in a skimpy pink thong waving two plastic cocks shouting "bonerrr bonerrr" to small children by his side isn't a sexual image?

Although you stated, it is and whined about it in three posts.

Yet again.

But only in your world, of course.

Which kinda explains why you are so obsessed with it.

Why you mention it so regularly.

A picture in a library?

No, you wouldn't find that picture in a library other than the library in your head.

Who on earth would hunt google until they find such a picture and then post it?

Which is slightly bizarre, odd even, and even a bit scary.

I certainty know what you, and those like you, are capable of.

Yes, of course you do lol, which is why you posted that cartoon, right?

Which is why you googled it and then took the decision to post it, right?

Because this is how you spend your weekends, isn't it? With your cats, alone, angry, seething, and googling cartoons of a man in a pink thong waving two plastic cocks at two small children.

This really is how you occupy your time, isn't it?

(who largely happen to be white males of a certain age) on a public forum with an audience of adults is offensive to you?

You do understand that I don't make the rules of this site, right?

Alongside yet more of your nutty professor made up facts.

 

[Raining_Roses]

What a disturbed individual you are, especially taking into account your previous three posts.

Posting a "cartoon" of a man in a skimpy pink thong waving two plastic cocks shouting "bonerrr bonerrr" to small children by his side isn't a sexual image?

Although you stated, it is and whined about it in three posts.

Yet again.

But only in your world, of course.

Which kinda explains why you are so obsessed with it.

Why you mention it so regularly.

A picture in a library?

No, you wouldn't find that picture in a library other than the library in your head.

Who on earth would hunt google until they find such a picture and then post it?

Which is slightly bizarre, odd even, and even a bit scary.




Yes, of course you do lol, which is why you posted that cartoon, right?

Which is why you googled it and then took the decision to post it, right?

Because this is how you spend your weekends, isn't it? With your cats, alone, angry, seething, and googling cartoons of a man in a pink thong waving two plastic cocks at two small children.

This really is how you occupy your time, isn't it?



You do understand that I don't make the rules of this site, right?

Alongside yet more of your nutty professor made up facts.

Me, disturbed? Your the man who thinks he's a woman. A sadly pornified example of our time, shovelling sh!t over your mummy issues, which you bury deep down inside, alongside any logical reasoning you might have possessed at one point. Harping on about women's rights and equality- you're the most misogynistic brand of male out there! No doubt, sitting in your little gammon tower, with a down-trodden little handmaiden to play up to your over-inflated ego. Did it start when she got pregnant? Surprising how many fall into their AGP tendencies around then and start demanding others play along.

Please- take the floor and tell us all about how Terfs are crazy cat ladies. You're only jealous that we own a pus-say and still get more than you do.