Too soon?

[TwoWhalesInAPool]

Did someone say 'false flag'?

Come on.

It was touch and Gogh.

Ear, ear!

Donald Duck, profile pic.

 

[TwoWhalesInAPool]

If only the media and Maga c.unts would scream and shout this loudly when it’s a third grade classroom instead of an nicked ear.

 

[TwoWhalesInAPool]

 

[Confused_Fred]

This is really bad taste. People died. No matter what you think of Trump, you should feel something for those who turn up and got shot.
Or is it a case that the "little people" don't mater ?

 

[TwoWhalesInAPool]

 

[TwoWhalesInAPool]

Anyway, it's good news for Don the Con.

His emotional support racist is on the way.
.

 

[Moriarty]

Sick.
Someone died, 2 people injured and the first attempt at political assassination since Reagen over 40 years ago.
Will you be so happy in 4 years when someone other than Trump might have to face a bullet because its ok to target someone who has a "Bullseye" painted on them.
Pathetic.

 

[TwoWhalesInAPool]

 

[Kev45]

Did someone say 'false flag'?

Do you see what the resident firearms expert wrote on the 'President Trump' thread?

Apparently, according to our resident expert, it is NOT Secret Service sniper policy to shoot an unidentified suspect hiding on a roof 150 yards away, with an automatic weapon, aimed directly at the President of the USA.

Instead, according to our expert, it is policy to fire a warning shot to distract the gunman while they get the President to safety.

In a country where law enforcement shoot unarmed teenagers in the back for running away.

It won't be long before he tells us about his career in the American Secret Service, right?

 

[TwoWhalesInAPool]

Do you see what the resident firearms expert wrote on the 'President Trump' thread?

Apparently, according to our resident expert, it is NOT Secret Service sniper policy to shoot an unidentified suspect hiding on a roof 150 yards away, with an automatic weapon, aimed directly at the President of the USA.

Instead, according to our expert, it is policy to fire a warning shot to distract the gunman while they get the President to safety.

In a country where law enforcement shoot unarmed teenagers in the back for running away.

It won't be long before he tells us about his career in the American Secret Service, right?

Absolutely correct!

Plus, what a creepy c.unt you have to be to use the death of an innocent victim to try and 'have a go' at someone you don't know or agree with on a chat forum message board. But typical of its ilk!

The only areas it is an expert in is alcohol addiction, its own low self esteem and lying.

 

[Kev45]

Plus, what a creepy c.unt you have to be to use the death of an innocent victim to try and 'have a go' at someone you don't know or agree with on a chat forum message board. But typical of its ilk!

And exactly the same pair of cockalorums who post a good chunk of negative posts about the most vulnerable in our society on a fairly frequent basis on this forum. Whether it be about the sick and disabled, benefit claimants, single mothers, or asylum seekers and economic migrants, etc.

Secret service policy is never to open fire first, so thats standard...

Secret Service snipers engaged him within 3 seconds of him opening fire, they could have dropped a bullet near him before he started to fire.

What the bejesus does this gibberish even mean?


“Commander, I have the shooter in my sight, he is taking aim, I am taking the headshot.”

“Do not kill the shooter agent 51, fire a distracting shot first.”

“Sir, Sir, the President is dead.”

“Take the headshot agent 51 you bloody fool, are you stupid?”

 

[Moriarty]

I take it, as usual you did not read what I said.
All the information I gave is open and simple to look up.

In fact it is quoted in several news articles.

So silly.

 

[Kev45]

This one lives in a fantasy world.

Makes a preposterous claim, and then says “look it up”.

In his fantasy world, Secret Service snipers wait for an armed assailant on a roof to shoot at an ex President before they retaliate.

 

[Moriarty]

Kev, hate to say it, but they do have a no shoot first directive.
Intent is not a crime, action is.

 

[Kev45]

Lives in an online dream world, and with NO evidence, of course.

A dream world where the President gets killed by an armed assassin because there is an imaginary “no shoot first” directive.

An American police officer would shoot you stone-cold dead if you pulled a gun.

But of course, the world's most powerful man (or woman) has to take a hit to the head before any action can be taken.