They can't explain why they hate.

[TwoWhalesInAPool]

Jack Monroe, and five other people reactionary gammon dickheads can't explain why they hate.​

Thanks to highlighting food poverty again, writer Jack Monroe is despised by Britain’s many reactionary gammon b.astards.
Here’s why she and other celebrities are on the their confusing hate lists.

Jack Monroe
Jack’s crimes are many: she’s non-binary, she’s written for the Guardian, and she doesn’t have long hair like a proper girl. But worst of all she pretends poor people aren’t 100 per cent to blame for fvcking up their lives. Stop pandering to them. A massive pack of chopped pig’s heart is only £1.37. That’s easily a week of sandwiches.

Emma Watson
Why would there be a problem with this lovely English rose? Because she didn’t agree with JK Rowling about transgender issues and therefore wants male children to have their todgers chopped off and unfairly compete in women’s sports. It’s obvious, really.

Lenny Henry
It’s not because he’s black, except for the racists for whom it’s definitely because he’s black. No, it’s because of Comic Relief, where he cons soft-hearted Brits into helping lazy Africans who can’t be arsed to depose dictators. And they’re not going to bother preventing famines when we keep giving them free sacks of delicious grain.

Emmeline Pankhurst
Pankhurst wasn’t a typical modern feminist – for example, she was quite keen on handing out white feathers to ‘cowards’ in WW1. However right-wing idiots think she’s Germaine Greer, and it’s all her fault women always get custody of the kids and you can’t playfully grab a nice handful of arse at work.

Jon Snow
Strictly speaking, the Channel 4 presenter shouldn’t occasionally reveal his liberal views. But right-wing w4nkers demand that an intelligent, mature man immersed in politics must have no political opinions, which is about as realistic as showing your dog a documentary about battery farming and expecting it to become a vegetarian of its own accord.

Gary Lineker
Lineker can fairly be described as annoyingly chirpy with a few liberal opinions. That’s if you’re sane. To gammons, KGB News viewers and Brexiters he’s a Lord Haw-Haw traitor who deserves the most extreme punishments devised by man, maybe a combination of boiling in oil, crucifixion and being flayed to death. Although he probably does deserve a bit of torture for all those bloody crisp adverts.

via ~ DailyReacuntionary

 

[TwoWhalesInAPool]

quote:

''Study in The Lancet finds more than 5 million children worldwide have lost a parent or caregiver in the pandemic. The impact of that loss is deep & profound with lifelong health and social consequences. No more talk about how COVID doesn't affect kids.''

The Lancet

Global, regional and national minimum estimates of children affected by COVID-19-associated orphanhood and caregiver death, by age, and family circumstance up to Oct 31, 2021: an updated modelling study.

H Juliette T Unwin, PhD. Susan Hillis, PhD. Prof Lucie Cluver, PhD. Seth Flaxman, PhD. Philip S Goldman, MA. Alexander Butchart, PhD, etc al.

Full article - via Open access @ The Lancet, Child and Adolescent Health, Published:February 24, 2022.

We used updated excess mortality and fertility data to model increases in minimum estimates of COVID-19-associated orphanhood and caregiver deaths from our original study period of March 1, 2020–April 30, 2021, to include the new period of May 1–Oct 31, 2021, for 21 countries. Orphanhood was defined as the death of one or both parents; primary caregiver loss included parental death or the death of one or both custodial grandparents; and secondary caregiver loss included co-residing grandparents or kin.

The number of children affected by COVID-19-associated orphanhood and caregiver death is estimated to have increased by 90·0% (95% CrI 89·7–90·4) from April 30 to Oct 31, 2021, from 2 737 300 (95% CrI 1 976 100–2 987 000) to 5 200 300 (3 619 400–5 731 400). Between March 1, 2020, and Oct 31, 2021, 491 300 (95% CrI 485 100–497 900) children aged 0–4 years, 736 800 (726 900–746 500) children aged 5–9 years, and 2 146 700 (2 120 900–2 174 200) children aged 10–17 years are estimated to have experienced COVID-19-associated orphanhood. Globally, 76·5% (95% CrI 76·3–76·7) of children were paternal orphans, whereas 23·5% (23·3–23·7) were maternal orphans. In each age group and region, the prevalence of paternal orphanhood exceeded that of maternal orphanhood.