The Nobel Peace Prize Awarded to Two Journalists Whilst Julian Assange Awaits to be Deported to the United States

O

Oswestrian

Guest
The irony of two journalists winning the Nobel Prize for Peace is that the United Kingdom is about to extradite Julian Assange to the USA after he exposed the US for their invasion of Iraq in 2003. Remember that they claimed it was because of Weapons of Mass Destruction ?

If we admit that Julian Assange was wrong for having published very private government cables not meant to be seen by the public, we must also admit that the United States almost certainly knew that there were no Weapons of Mass Destruction BEFORE she invaded Iraq !

The question of whether the US knew that Saddam didn't have any Weapons of Mass Destruction before she invaded Iraq WILL NOT GO AWAY.

Once the genie is out of the bottle it can never be put back into the bottle. The United States DOES NOT HAVE A MONOPOLY ON THE TRUTH. No country, no matter how powerful she is, does.

The following is a direct quotation from Brown University's Watson Institute of International & Public Affairs (Page updated as of June 2021).

"No one knows with certainty how many people have been killed and wounded in Iraq since the 2003 United States invasion. However, we know that between 184,382 and 207,156 civilians have died from direct war related violence caused by the U.S., its allies, the Iraqi military and police, and opposition forces from the time of the invasion through October 2019. The violent deaths of Iraqi civilians have occurred through aerial bombing, shelling, gunshots, suicide attacks, and fires started by bombing. Many civilians have also been injured."
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Moriarty

UKChat Celebrity
Joined
Jan 5, 2018
Messages
1,540
Reaction score
772
The USA is still a young country.
They are like an angry, angsty teenager with a big ego.

The sooner they grow up the better, might calm them down a bit.
 

SamBally

Dance with me until the sun rises!
Joined
Apr 13, 2021
Messages
2,022
Reaction score
1,930
The irony of two journalists winning the Nobel Prize for Peace is that the United Kingdom is about to extradite Julian Assange to the USA after he exposed the US for their invasion of Iraq in 2003. Remember that they claimed it was because of Weapons of Mass Destruction ?

You might be interested to be reminded one Sir Keir Starmer QC, when head of the CPS and the next PM in waiting cynically threw Assange under a bus.

"As DPP, Sir Keir Starmer tempered his supposed love of liberty by fast-tracking the extradition of Julian Assange (a process now making its way through the courts). He flouted legal precedents by advising Swedish lawyers not to question Assange in Britain: a decision that prolonged the latter’s legal purgatory denied closure to his accusers in Sweden and sealed his fate before a US show trial. Leaked emails from August 2012 show that, when the Swedish legal team expressed hesitancy about keeping Assange’s case open, Sir Keir’s office replied: ‘Don’t you dare get cold feet’.


Documents released under Freedom of Information requests to Italian magazine La Repubblica confirm the very close relationship between the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) and Sweden in the Julian Assange case. The files contain hundreds of mostly redacted emails sent over a five-year period.

But according to one authoritative source, the number of CPS documents relating to the case may be much greater than has so far been disclosed."

The American appeal was always going to be successful, the world finding out just how corrupt the next British PM really is, alongside the British judiciary, wouldn't be something they want advertised...
 

Moriarty

UKChat Celebrity
Joined
Jan 5, 2018
Messages
1,540
Reaction score
772
Added to that, all counts of criminal actions have been dropped in Sweden.

Assange is being held, in a maximum security prison for bail jumping by requesting asylum from a foriegn nation.
We do it for Russian defectors do we not.

For which, under international law he is allowed to do if he and his legal representatives deem:-
"The accused could not be given a fair trial".

The extradition to the USA is therefore fruit of the poisened tree.

He should be immediatly released, then arrested and charged with whatever crime he commited on UK soil.

Any charges brought against him should factor in time served and he should be released if he broke no UK laws.

Thats the way I see it, if I am wrong from a legal standpoint I would love to know.
 
Back
Top