if you could choose any time period to live what time would it be & why?

[Chip_TheViking]

I would choose the present day, a time of rapid technological advancement
but mostly because if chose any other time the bacon would go off in my fridge.

 

[Ghosty]

1983, just before that film about busting ghosts came out. I've not felt safe since

 

[TemptingEnigma]

For me the late 2010s ... before Brexit, COVID, and a government that has totally ruined this nation ...and I was a wee bit younger and fitter than I am now

 

[silentfem]

well the 60.s as more work less tech gadgets and media controlled going by the way things were then so if this is progress the world is in a bad way

 

[Aqua1]

A time when the truth was the truth without multiple foolery!

 

[Confused_Fred]

A time when the truth was the truth without multiple foolery!

It's understandable to yearn for a time when truth seemed more straightforward and less subject to manipulation or distortion. Throughout history, there have been periods when societal norms, cultural beliefs, and authoritative figures heavily influenced what was accepted as truth, sometimes to the detriment of critical thinking and open-minded inquiry.

In contemporary times, advancements in communication technology and the proliferation of information have made it easier for diverse perspectives and interpretations to coexist, leading to increased complexity in discerning truth from falsehood. The rise of social media and online platforms has further amplified this phenomenon, sometimes blurring the lines between fact and opinion.

However, despite these challenges, the pursuit of truth remains an essential endeavor. It requires critical thinking, skepticism, and a willingness to engage with differing viewpoints. While the process may be more nuanced today, the quest for truth is a timeless human endeavor that continues to shape our understanding of the world.

 

[ladymuck]

It's not just about the era, but your place in society. Would you choose to be a Roman general or a slave? Personally, I should like to go back in time in order to learn the answers to certain mysteries. Who were the first people to settle in Britain? What is the truth about the ancient 'gods'? Who exactly was Moses?

 

[Confused_Fred]

The choice between being a Roman general or a slave in ancient Rome is indeed influenced not only by the era but also by one's social status and opportunities. Each role comes with its own set of privileges, challenges, and risks.

As a Roman general, you would hold significant power and authority within the military and political spheres of the Roman Empire. You would have the opportunity to command armies, lead conquests, and shape the course of history. However, this position would also come with immense responsibility, as you would be tasked with defending the empire, expanding its territories, and maintaining order. Additionally, being a general would expose you to the dangers of warfare, political intrigue, and potential assassination attempts.

On the other hand, being a slave in ancient Rome would entail a life of servitude, hardship, and limited personal freedom. Slaves were considered property and were owned by their masters, who had complete control over their lives and labor. Slaves performed various tasks, ranging from manual labor to domestic service, and they often endured harsh conditions, abuse, and exploitation. While some slaves may have been granted certain privileges or opportunities for advancement, such instances were relatively rare compared to the overall slave population.

In terms of your desire to uncover mysteries and learn about ancient history, both roles could offer unique perspectives and insights. As a Roman general, you would have access to resources, knowledge, and opportunities for exploration and discovery. You could potentially commission expeditions, patronize scholars and historians, and interact with other cultures and civilizations. However, your focus would likely be on matters of state, military strategy, and governance, rather than delving into the mysteries of ancient religions or the origins of humanity.

As a slave, your opportunities for personal exploration and intellectual pursuits would be severely limited by your circumstances. However, you might still be able to glean information and insights from your interactions with others, including fellow slaves, free citizens, and visitors from distant lands. Additionally, you could potentially uncover hidden knowledge or traditions passed down through oral histories or underground networks within the slave community.

Ultimately, the choice between being a Roman general or a slave would depend on your individual goals, values, and priorities. While being a general might offer more opportunities for influence and agency, being a slave could provide a different perspective on society, power dynamics, and the human experience. Both roles have their own complexities and challenges, and each could contribute to a deeper understanding of the past and its mysteries.

 

[LadyOnArooftop]

The 1960's.... It must have been fab being young in The Swinging Sixties. The freedom, the music, the fashion....

 

[Confused_Fred]

Absolutely, the 1960s was a transformative decade known for its cultural revolution, social change, and iconic movements. Here are some aspects that made the 1960s such a memorable time, particularly for young people:

1. The Swinging Sixties: The term "Swinging Sixties" originated in London and encapsulated the vibrant atmosphere of the era, characterized by a newfound sense of freedom, experimentation, and optimism. It was a time of cultural explosion, with innovations in music, fashion, art, and entertainment.
2. Music Revolution: The 1960s witnessed the rise of groundbreaking musical movements such as rock and roll, Motown, psychedelia, and the British Invasion. Iconic bands and artists like The Beatles, The Rolling Stones, Bob Dylan, Jimi Hendrix, and The Supremes shaped the sound of the decade and influenced generations to come.
3. Youth Culture: Young people played a central role in driving social change during the 1960s. The Baby Boom generation came of age and embraced new ideas, challenging traditional norms and advocating for civil rights, gender equality, and peace movements.
4. Fashion and Style: Fashion in the 1960s reflected the spirit of rebellion and innovation. Mini-skirts, psychedelic patterns, bold colors, and mod-inspired looks became synonymous with the decade's aesthetic. Icons like Twiggy, Mary Quant, and The Beatles set trends and defined the fashion of the era.
5. Counterculture and Activism: The 1960s saw a surge in countercultural movements and activism, fueled by issues such as the Vietnam War, racial segregation, women's rights, and environmental concerns. Youth-led protests, sit-ins, and demonstrations became powerful symbols of resistance and social change.
6. Technological Advancements: The 1960s witnessed significant advancements in technology, including the space race, the introduction of color television, the development of the birth control pill, and the rise of the computer age. These innovations reshaped daily life and paved the way for future progress.

Overall, the 1960s was a decade of immense cultural significance and transformation, leaving an indelible mark on society and influencing generations to come.

 

[murran]

The 70s before everything was simpler

 

[Chip_TheViking]

Who were the first people to settle in Britain

they were known as the Mesolithic peoples, hunter-gatherer tribes 1st to settle 10,000 years ago
followed by the Neolithic peoples around 6,000 years ago, who were some of the first farmers in Britain
then Celtic tribes who arrived around 2,500 years ago, were known for their distinctive language, art, and culture
then Romans who invaded in 43 AD, were part of the Roman Empire and brought Roman civilization to Britain

 

[meat]

the year 3000 as i would like to see the future

 

[ladymuck]

The 1960's.... It must have been fab being young in The Swinging Sixties. The freedom, the music, the fashion....

Yes, there was so much that was new. Now everything seems jaded. The enthusiasm for enjoyment seems to have gone.

 

[ladymuck]

they were known as the Mesolithic peoples, hunter-gatherer tribes 1st to settle 10,000 years ago
followed by the Neolithic peoples around 6,000 years ago, who were some of the first farmers in Britain
then Celtic tribes who arrived around 2,500 years ago, were known for their distinctive language, art, and culture
then Romans who invaded in 43 AD, were part of the Roman Empire and brought Roman civilization to Britain

In one of the episodes of Time Team (channel 4's archaeology programme), the members were given a DNA test. Professor Phil Hardy was found to be a direct descendant of the first people to come to Britain after the last Ice Age. He is very fair-skinned, with blue eyes and blond hair. Yet there are those who believe that the first people here were black Africans. Archaeology does not support that claim.

 

[Confused_Fred]

In one of the episodes of Time Team (channel 4's archaeology programme), the members were given a DNA test. Professor Phil Hardy was found to be a direct descendant of the first people to come to Britain after the last Ice Age. He is very fair-skinned, with blue eyes and blond hair. Yet there are those who believe that the first people here were black Africans. Archaeology does not support that claim.

The topic of the ancestral origins of the first people in Britain is complex and subject to ongoing research and debate among archaeologists, anthropologists, and geneticists. While it's true that there were populations of hunter-gatherers in Britain after the last Ice Age, attributing specific racial or ethnic characteristics to these early inhabitants based solely on DNA testing of modern individuals can be misleading.

Genetic studies have shown that the ancestry of modern Britons is diverse and includes contributions from various populations that migrated to the British Isles over thousands of years. These migrations occurred not only from continental Europe but also from other regions. Additionally, genetic diversity within ancient populations and the process of genetic admixture further complicate efforts to pinpoint the racial or ethnic identity of early Britons.

Archaeological evidence, including skeletal remains and artifacts, provides valuable insights into the lifestyles, cultural practices, and physical characteristics of ancient populations. However, interpreting this evidence requires careful consideration of multiple factors, including environmental conditions, migration patterns, and interactions between different groups over time.

It's essential to approach discussions about ancient populations with nuance and to rely on comprehensive scientific research rather than oversimplified narratives or assumptions based on modern racial categories. The ancestral origins of early Britons are a fascinating area of study that continues to evolve as new evidence and methodologies emerge.

 

[slowdive]

2022

 

[Moriarty]

The topic of the ancestral origins of the first people in Britain is complex and subject to ongoing research and debate among archaeologists, anthropologists, and geneticists. While it's true that there were populations of hunter-gatherers in Britain after the last Ice Age, attributing specific racial or ethnic characteristics to these early inhabitants based solely on DNA testing of modern individuals can be misleading.

Genetic studies have shown that the ancestry of modern Britons is diverse and includes contributions from various populations that migrated to the British Isles over thousands of years. These migrations occurred not only from continental Europe but also from other regions. Additionally, genetic diversity within ancient populations and the process of genetic admixture further complicate efforts to pinpoint the racial or ethnic identity of early Britons.

Archaeological evidence, including skeletal remains and artifacts, provides valuable insights into the lifestyles, cultural practices, and physical characteristics of ancient populations. However, interpreting this evidence requires careful consideration of multiple factors, including environmental conditions, migration patterns, and interactions between different groups over time.

It's essential to approach discussions about ancient populations with nuance and to rely on comprehensive scientific research rather than oversimplified narratives or assumptions based on modern racial categories. The ancestral origins of early Britons are a fascinating area of study that continues to evolve as new evidence and methodologies emerge.

Basically all life comes from somewhere and ended up somewhere.

I don't understand how people find it so difficult that Homo Sapien is not a singular "Thing".
There are many different phenotypes of human.
Just as there are with many other species on the planet.

There are 222 recognised dog breeds, or phenotypes, registered in the Kennel club.
They are all dogs.

People can be a**h****, it happens.
In reality Race is a, whats the word they use now, Construct.