TwoWhalesInAPool
UKChat Celebrity
- Joined
- Aug 12, 2018
- Messages
- 3,905
- Reaction score
- 2,346
Five reasons Liverpool should get over The Beatles
Liverpool is to get £2 million to set up yet another Beatles attraction.
Here’s why the city should move on from this obscure, rarely-discussed band.
They’ve got the worst name in rock history
The band apparently took ‘inspiration’ from Buddy Holly’s The Crickets, who didn’t look like insects either. In interviews they’ve referred to the name having a ‘double meaning’. Beat group, geddit? We think what they meant to say was ‘being a very crap pun’.
They didn’t exactly hang around in Liverpool, did they?
Face it, the moment they made it, they were down to London, LA or even the Mull of Kintyre. They kept their Liverpool accents and Liverpool memories but not actual Liverpool addresses. Maybe they bloody hated Liverpool? At least The Human League stuck it out in Sheffield.
A museum, for fcuk’s sake
Maybe Nadine Dorries (born Liverpool, currently an MP in Bedfordshire) thinks she’s doing the city she sodded off from a favour, but c’mon, a museum? Museums are for suits of armour and bits of 5,000-year-old vases, not pop groups. If you need a Beatles museum, just take out a subscription to the monthly rock music press.
You’re a city, not a bloody Ringo Starr theme park
Manchester got over Freddie and the Dreamers and The Hollies. Wolverhampton even got over Slade. Not until about six months ago, but they did. C’mon! Make the effort!
You’ve got Mo Salah, Jurgen Klopp, Stephen Graham, Jodie Comer, Kim Cattrall, Oya Paya and shitloads more
You’ll survive. Plus there are people like Mel C and Jimmy Tarbuck if you need to make up the numbers. Think about it, you could be Hull. What have they got? The Housemartins and the smell of fish.
via - Daily BoomTish
