Any thoughts on limitations?

[hell2bwith76]

I wonder if it might be a good idea to limit the number of persons in any chatroom ,.so it doesn`t get flooded or tied up with just a small group chatting at any one time ?. On previous chat sites which i used the number of chatters would be limited to around 40 ,which would allow for some guests too. At this time the rooms get so crowdd with chat it`s sometimes difficult to see who`s talking to who and it`s easy to mistake a comment which may be in response to someone else and not even meant for you .
Responses please ?.

 

[BizarreBabe]

I wonder if it might be a good idea to limit the number of persons in any chatroom ,.so it doesn`t get flooded or tied up with just a small group chatting at any one time ?. On previous chat sites which i used the number of chatters would be limited to around 40 ,which would allow for some guests too. At this time the rooms get so crowdd with chat it`s sometimes difficult to see who`s talking to who and it`s easy to mistake a comment which may be in response to someone else and not even meant for you .
Responses please ?.

That happens to me regardless with my ever growing block list!
I tend to focus on the people who interest me and don't usually notice the others. It can get confusing, true. People should address people which would make following chat much easier. As long as your responses are polite it's not the end of the world if you get it wrong.

 

[JoJoTia3rd]

They had room limits on AOL n all that happened was the popular room was never empty cos no one took their name out so no new people could enter, so its a stupid idea

 

[Common-Carnage]

Perhaps you need to find a chat room with those limitations then, if you're not happy not being the centre of attention here, maybe find somewhere where you are, you can quit crying about the fact that not everybody loves you then, too. Win win.

 

[hell2bwith76]

They had room limits on AOL n all that happened was the popular room was never empty cos no one took their name out so no new people could enter, so its a stupid idea

That`s a stupid thing to say .When i was on aol they had limits on chatters per room and all that happened was that sometimes it was necessary to wait a while to get into the room which one preferred . As soon as one room filled to capacity they opened another same named room and called it *** 2 or 3 etc. Nobody was ever shut out of the site .Why would anyone want new people to come into a room anyway ? the regs can fill any of the rooms with chat to overflow !.

 

[JoJoTia3rd]

I don't think the new chatters have any issue with how many are in a room more the merrier, I think it's you with the issue

 

[hell2bwith76]

Perhaps you need to find a chat room with those limitations then, if you're not happy not being the centre of attention here, maybe find somewhere where you are, you can quit crying about the fact that not everybody loves you then, too. Win win.

Making false accusations against myself isn`t really a way for an adult(?) to disagree with someone elses opinion is it ?

 

[hell2bwith76]

I don't think the new chatters have any issue with how many are in a room more the merrier, I think it's you with the issue

which "new" chatters ? Do any new chatters get chance to mingle with 180 roomies all trying to chat at once ? The "new" chatters are just the Gusts who never join in anyway ! Maybe they can`t ?.

 

[Common-Carnage]

Making false accusations against myself isn`t really a way for an adult(?) to disagree with someone elses opinion is it ?

Oh you are funny, carry on.

 

[JoJoTia3rd]

Oh do stop ya moaning over petty things hell2bwith76 it's getting old

 

[WickedPerdition]

I wonder if it might be a good idea to limit the number of persons in any chatroom ,.so it doesn`t get flooded or tied up with just a small group chatting at any one time ?. On previous chat sites which i used the number of chatters would be limited to around 40 ,which would allow for some guests too. At this time the rooms get so crowdd with chat it`s sometimes difficult to see who`s talking to who and it`s easy to mistake a comment which may be in response to someone else and not even meant for you .
Responses please ?.

Before you decide to enter any chat room you see the number of chatters in each room which is quite often a deciding factor for a lot of people.
Some chatters frequent only one chat room on a regular basis and rarely ever stray from that room. You get to know who you expect to find in certain rooms, which can be useful if you prefer a certain level/type of chat.
I'd say that on average only about 50% of the room list participates in the actual chat in most rooms, so in a way, they aren't adding to any confusion with the general chat.
Where I do agree with you is when there are a lot of people cross-talking, that if your name isn't 'tabbed', you can easily miss any comments/replies directed to you, which obviously can be quite frustrating. However, that's often due to laziness on the part of many chatters.
In summary, I don't think limiting the number permitted in a chat room is really necessary because it doesn't affect most chatter's focus on who they are chatting to.
I have been denied the capacity to vote because my opinion, apparently, 'does not matter' <lol>, however in this instance, I would vote NO.

 

[yaris]

When I first started chatting back in the stone age it was on Friendsreunitedconnections, they had a limit on all rooms, 20 per room, most rooms never got to the limit but the popular ones were always full. You had to wait till someone dropped out and most of the time you would be waiting all day to get in cos people would leave their name there and "wander off site". I don't think making rooms have a limit would benefit anyone, you wouldn't get many new charters trying the site, if people are not happy with how things are maybe they should look elsewhere.

 

[Clarity]

Can you imagine having a room limit? Some people go into a frenzy and melt down if they get banned or for some reason cannot get in for the fear of missing out on something!! You would get more people constantly staying logged in (I don't get why people do that anyway) even if there at Asda just to ensure they have a place in the room. Plus we need new chatters like it ir not and you would probably find if they couldn't get in the rooms they will go elsewhere.

 

[megs233]

There just few of the answer your going to get and it a big fat NO .

 

[BizarreBabe]

As friendly as ever on these threads.

Can you imagine having a room limit? Some people go into a frenzy and melt down if they get banned or for some reason cannot get in for the fear of missing out on something!! You would get more people constantly staying logged in (I don't get why people do that anyway) even if there at Asda just to ensure they have a place in the room. Plus we need new chatters like it ir not and you would probably find if they couldn't get in the rooms they will go elsewhere.

I've seen it happen before... I think it makes sites look more popular than they are.
Maybe it makes people want it more because they have to work for it and keep that slot they worked for lol

 

[Lau40]

Before you decide to enter any chat room you see the number of chatters in each room which is quite often a deciding factor for a lot of people.
Some chatters frequent only one chat room on a regular basis and rarely ever stray from that room. You get to know who you expect to find in certain rooms, which can be useful if you prefer a certain level/type of chat.
I'd say that on average only about 50% of the room list participates in the actual chat in most rooms, so in a way, they aren't adding to any confusion with the general chat.
Where I do agree with you is when there are a lot of people cross-talking, that if your name isn't 'tabbed', you can easily miss any comments/replies directed to you, which obviously can be quite frustrating. However, that's often due to laziness on the part of many chatters.
In summary, I don't think limiting the number permitted in a chat room is really necessary because it doesn't affect most chatter's focus on who they are chatting to.
I have been denied the capacity to vote because my opinion, apparently, 'does not matter' <lol>, however in this instance, I would vote NO.

I'd be devastated if i couldnt get in the same room as you wicked.. Who else would compliment me in such a lovely manner?

 

[hell2bwith76]

Before you decide to enter any chat room you see the number of chatters in each room which is quite often a deciding factor for a lot of people.
Some chatters frequent only one chat room on a regular basis and rarely ever stray from that room. You get to know who you expect to find in certain rooms, which can be useful if you prefer a certain level/type of chat.
I'd say that on average only about 50% of the room list participates in the actual chat in most rooms, so in a way, they aren't adding to any confusion with the general chat.
Where I do agree with you is when there are a lot of people cross-talking, that if your name isn't 'tabbed', you can easily miss any comments/replies directed to you, which obviously can be quite frustrating. However, that's often due to laziness on the part of many chatters.
In summary, I don't think limiting the number permitted in a chat room is really necessary because it doesn't affect most chatter's focus on who they are chatting to.
I have been denied the capacity to vote because my opinion, apparently, 'does not matter' <lol>, however in this instance, I would vote NO.

I`ll shove a "no" vote in for you as you seem to be a target for admin who hate anyone who is intellectual and literate Take care .

 

[hell2bwith76]

Oh do stop ya moaning over petty things hell2bwith76 it's getting old

...and of course you are young eh ? roflmao !

 

[Bad_Influence]

Intellectual? <lol> <lol> <lol>

 

[bhgxusa0123]

Let's see this can be #3 complaint about the site you always frequent, where is the compliment about the site??